archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xufeng zhang <>
	Alexei Starovoitov <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: Add a BPF helper for getting the cgroup path of current task
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:06:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

在 2021/5/13 上午6:55, Alexei Starovoitov 写道:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:58:23PM +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
>> To implement security rules for application containers by utilizing
>> bpf LSM, the container to which the current running task belongs need
>> to be known in bpf context. Think about this scenario: kubernetes
>> schedules a pod into one host, before the application container can run,
>> the security rules for this application need to be loaded into bpf
>> maps firstly, so that LSM bpf programs can make decisions based on
>> this rule maps.
>> However, there is no effective bpf helper to achieve this goal,
>> especially for cgroup v1. In the above case, the only available information
>> from user side is container-id, and the cgroup path for this container
>> is certain based on container-id, so in order to make a bridge between
>> user side and bpf programs, bpf programs also need to know the current
>> cgroup path of running task.
> ...
>> +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_current_cpuset_cgroup_path, char *, buf, u32, buf_len)
>> +{
>> +	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
>> +	int retval;
>> +
>> +	css = task_get_css(current, cpuset_cgrp_id);
>> +	retval = cgroup_path_ns(css->cgroup, buf, buf_len, &init_cgroup_ns);
>> +	css_put(css);
>> +	if (retval >= buf_len)
>> +		retval = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> Manipulating string path to check the hierarchy will be difficult to do
> inside bpf prog. It seems to me this helper will be useful only for
> simplest cgroup setups where there is no additional cgroup nesting
> within containers.
> Have you looked at *ancestor_cgroup_id and *cgroup_id helpers?
> They're a bit more flexible when dealing with hierarchy and
> can be used to achieve the same correlation between kernel and user cgroup ids.


do you have any suggestion?

what I am thinking is the internal kernel object(cgroup id or ns.inum) 
is not so user friendly, we can get the container-context from them for 
tracing scenario, but not for LSM blocking cases, I'm not sure how 
Google internally resolve similar issue.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-14  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12  9:58 [RFC] [PATCH bpf-next 0/1] Implement getting cgroup path bpf helper Xufeng Zhang
2021-05-12  9:58 ` [RFC] [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: Add a BPF helper for getting the cgroup path of current task Xufeng Zhang
2021-05-12 22:55   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-05-13  8:57     ` xufeng zhang
2021-05-14  4:20       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-05-14 11:21         ` KP Singh
2021-05-14  4:06     ` xufeng zhang [this message]
2021-05-14 11:20       ` KP Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).