From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3E1C43387 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B835220870 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:09:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547190580; bh=1DkYafFXfMIX69gNMzX0Yy9uyrr7GLTYTIJyItOnrks=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=XsVHwNMxMyOR/aE4diLwgoB75XkpGYXqd65AYU5wjRTSkMgUrHBWQuQcCPoa2VuQb uId++nXX+XVY7fPmXc/hpTRCCtqlqkIlWgsGBvGjv76YGyXnnQuSgL480mkiGo0jqt QTQ7MdcvOe+gYme9Ex7Cigikqu8A1dc0d7sItc0I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728031AbfAKHJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:09:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com ([209.85.128.53]:36145 "EHLO mail-wm1-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726503AbfAKHJj (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:09:39 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id p6so1287688wmc.1; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:09:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yXXJR2k7BkPE9cXHh5TruFsxgDYpyyyhOKTAXbRFNME=; b=YHuz5CRxpgjbh/4bMoV5YMoV4lHCV32OXVI0MfKMFb0KDspNyfd1mT6sSPmAyZjZKw ZwjmAjdRgwFXDo3V6E2JrQBEiJueJ0apvLHAaOiC8TMIO+YWiLTPWRAFlUwG0i0ibE25 lrLZJDBcVZxrhwbi890DPOcIYkEVahc1fPg4hJU+K+ifoM2aBEvSujj0AWu3EM50dCPc wTumQsTDTQG6+SYQ9iIDDxDZT08SZ/EweuXJIV6LTPdqp3R0zDFSeiEPW8XjbZT2CsJh POfKb6b2qWcxiUQ0zJQlwza3G0TQbFnAMFB0i4UFqfqa0l4W3omj7qJX6AmOklg3yyCL VVBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yXXJR2k7BkPE9cXHh5TruFsxgDYpyyyhOKTAXbRFNME=; b=O59x7PoGb0nr2YwX2CRQzWHUexzpng3/93BIKai3W1ebsWjtZ4OqbuxUvdumqDq7g2 fVIpv2zvlkv3/bth00L8ySYFfgB2bD4GJy3LXLSn/pZ2qUnqFyFxWLoSXGNkAf/OSFcH H+Dt7hiZ95f8p57r0xw43EzLb9IcsY06xLlQoZ8FU0nndg5gabGY+cXsl3VzZvidXPsT zFihtXYR3IEpEC2md8UnkJn1sEOnRClC3KMtGOGVpUhuAIHXw7RqAGNVHcxGZWnENbfs MWOHNtKwogCpbM2la4/V5fg5ul8EL3b3Wg9PIras9/+7pvs4KniEz1zlKkAh+WJtPePg 5mCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdMPTu4EXR5JIQGgn58J8o3VXsVe3a+O53ipheoQtitzhX0pPVX nWCtbp3thq2SdJsvHgMTkuI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7ND50Qul7gnmerUDxxDUeC+jrZwzswChxXpKkQIZLF7mp1c+UMXYjW90ShUEE1gxlCtifhyg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:544f:: with SMTP id p15mr1070958wmi.37.1547190577942; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:09:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 143sm33143526wml.14.2019.01.10.23.09.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:09:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:09:34 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tycho Andersen Cc: Kees Cook , James Morris , Linus Torvalds , linux-security-module , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] seccomp: build fix for v5.0-rc2 Message-ID: <20190111070934.GA92116@gmail.com> References: <20190109065916.GA29753@gmail.com> <20190110031839.GD28330@cisco> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190110031839.GD28330@cisco> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: * Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:59:16AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > This was already picked up by x86-urgent... > > > > > > -Kees > > > > I'm fine with both routes - if Linus pulls this I'll zap the x86/urgent > > one. > > The patches are different actually. I've confirmed the one in > x86/urgent is correct, and this one is from the initial thread where I > was just guessing. The difference is HOSTCFLAGS vs. HOSTLDFLAGS for .o > files. So I think we should drop this and just keep the one in > x86/urgent. Ok - will send this to Linus now. Thanks, Ingo