linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] tpm: ppi: rename TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID_1
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:00:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190122120024.GA7514@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190117174135.2117937-3-stefanb@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:41:32PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> TPM PPI 1.3 introduces a function revision 2 for some functions. So,
> rename the existing TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID_1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: David Safford <david.safford@ge.com>

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-22 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-17 17:41 [PATCH v2 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tpm: ppi: pass function revision ID to tpm_eval_dsm() Stefan Berger
2019-01-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tpm: ppi: rename TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID_1 Stefan Berger
2019-01-22 12:00   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-01-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tpm: ppi: Display up to 101 operations as define for version 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tpm: ppi: Possibly show command parameter if TPM PPI 1.3 is used Stefan Berger
2019-01-22 12:01   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tpm: ppi: Enable submission of optional command parameter for PPI 1.3 Stefan Berger
2019-01-22 12:01   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-22 12:10     ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190122120024.GA7514@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).