linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: [PATCH 13/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the audit_rule_match hooks
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:18:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228221933.2551-14-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228221933.2551-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

From: Casey Schaufler <cschaufler@schaufler-ca.com>

Convert the audit_rule_match hooks to use the lsm_export
structure instead of a u32 secid. There is quite a bit of scaffolding
involved that will be removed when security_audit_rule_match()
is updated.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h         |  6 +++---
 security/apparmor/audit.c         |  4 ++--
 security/apparmor/include/audit.h |  2 +-
 security/apparmor/include/secid.h |  2 +-
 security/apparmor/secid.c         | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 security/security.c               |  7 ++++++-
 security/selinux/hooks.c          | 17 -----------------
 security/selinux/include/audit.h  |  6 +++---
 security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 security/selinux/ss/services.c    |  7 +++++--
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c        |  8 +++++---
 11 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index d4f260812c20..932af86333b4 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@
  * @audit_rule_match:
  *	Determine if given @secid matches a rule previously approved
  *	by @audit_rule_known.
- *	@secid contains the security id in question.
+ *	@l points to the security data in question.
  *	@field contains the field which relates to current LSM.
  *	@op contains the operator that will be used for matching.
  *	@rule points to the audit rule that will be checked against.
@@ -1768,8 +1768,8 @@ union security_list_options {
 	int (*audit_rule_init)(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
 				void **lsmrule);
 	int (*audit_rule_known)(struct audit_krule *krule);
-	int (*audit_rule_match)(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule,
-				struct audit_context *actx);
+	int (*audit_rule_match)(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+				void *lsmrule, struct audit_context *actx);
 	void (*audit_rule_free)(void *lsmrule);
 #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
 
diff --git a/security/apparmor/audit.c b/security/apparmor/audit.c
index eeaddfe0c0fb..9a726892a068 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/audit.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/audit.c
@@ -225,14 +225,14 @@ int aa_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *rule)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int aa_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
+int aa_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
 			struct audit_context *actx)
 {
 	struct aa_audit_rule *rule = vrule;
 	struct aa_label *label;
 	int found = 0;
 
-	label = aa_secid_to_label(sid);
+	label = aa_secid_to_label(l);
 
 	if (!label)
 		return -ENOENT;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/audit.h b/security/apparmor/include/audit.h
index b8c8b1066b0a..5e4632bacd32 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/audit.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/audit.h
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static inline int complain_error(int error)
 void aa_audit_rule_free(void *vrule);
 int aa_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **vrule);
 int aa_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *rule);
-int aa_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
+int aa_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
 			struct audit_context *actx);
 
 #endif /* __AA_AUDIT_H */
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/secid.h b/security/apparmor/include/secid.h
index fa2062711b63..c283c620efe3 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/secid.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/secid.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct aa_label;
 /* secid value that matches any other secid */
 #define AA_SECID_WILDCARD 1
 
-struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(u32 secid);
+struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(struct lsm_export *l);
 int apparmor_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen);
 int apparmor_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
 void apparmor_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen);
diff --git a/security/apparmor/secid.c b/security/apparmor/secid.c
index 05373d9a3d6a..1546c45a2a18 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/secid.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/secid.c
@@ -61,9 +61,12 @@ void aa_secid_update(u32 secid, struct aa_label *label)
  *
  * see label for inverse aa_label_to_secid
  */
-struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(u32 secid)
+struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(struct lsm_export *l)
 {
 	struct aa_label *label;
+	u32 secid;
+
+	secid = (l->flags & LSM_EXPORT_APPARMOR) ? l->apparmor : 0;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	label = idr_find(&aa_secids, secid);
@@ -72,12 +75,22 @@ struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(u32 secid)
 	return label;
 }
 
+static inline void aa_import_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 secid)
+{
+	l->flags = LSM_EXPORT_APPARMOR;
+	l->apparmor = secid;
+}
+
 int apparmor_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
 {
 	/* TODO: cache secctx and ref count so we don't have to recreate */
-	struct aa_label *label = aa_secid_to_label(secid);
+	struct lsm_export data;
+	struct aa_label *label;
 	int len;
 
+	aa_import_secid(&data, secid);
+	label = aa_secid_to_label(&data);
+
 	AA_BUG(!seclen);
 
 	if (!label)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index bbb206b01e8e..51491fda1bc2 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2467,8 +2467,13 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
 int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule,
 			      struct audit_context *actx)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule,
+	int rc;
+	struct lsm_export data = { .flags = LSM_EXPORT_NONE };
+
+	rc = call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, &data, field, op, lsmrule,
 				actx);
+	lsm_export_secid(&data, &secid);
+	return rc;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
 
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 1004aa4fc5db..1cde918e4140 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -211,23 +211,6 @@ static void cred_init_security(void)
 	tsec->osid = tsec->sid = SECINITSID_KERNEL;
 }
 
-/*
- * Set the SELinux secid in an lsm_export structure
- */
-static inline void selinux_export_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 secid)
-{
-	l->selinux = secid;
-	l->flags |= LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX;
-}
-
-static inline void selinux_import_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 *secid)
-{
-	if (l->flags | LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX)
-		*secid = l->selinux;
-	else
-		*secid = SECSID_NULL;
-}
-
 /*
  * get the security ID of a set of credentials
  */
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/audit.h b/security/selinux/include/audit.h
index 36e1d44c0209..7daa44d188f7 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/audit.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/audit.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void selinux_audit_rule_free(void *rule);
 
 /**
  *	selinux_audit_rule_match - determine if a context ID matches a rule.
- *	@sid: the context ID to check
+ *	@l: points to the context ID to check
  *	@field: the field this rule refers to
  *	@op: the operater the rule uses
  *	@rule: pointer to the audit rule to check against
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ void selinux_audit_rule_free(void *rule);
  *	Returns 1 if the context id matches the rule, 0 if it does not, and
  *	-errno on failure.
  */
-int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *rule,
-			     struct audit_context *actx);
+int selinux_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+			     void *rule, struct audit_context *actx);
 
 /**
  *	selinux_audit_rule_known - check to see if rule contains selinux fields.
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/objsec.h b/security/selinux/include/objsec.h
index 3b78aa4ee98f..d7efc5f23c1e 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/objsec.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/objsec.h
@@ -50,6 +50,23 @@ static inline u32 current_sid(void)
 	return tsec->sid;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Set the SELinux secid in an lsm_export structure
+ */
+static inline void selinux_export_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 secid)
+{
+	l->selinux = secid;
+	l->flags |= LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX;
+}
+
+static inline void selinux_import_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 *secid)
+{
+	if (l->flags | LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX)
+		*secid = l->selinux;
+	else
+		*secid = SECSID_NULL;
+}
+
 enum label_initialized {
 	LABEL_INVALID,		/* invalid or not initialized */
 	LABEL_INITIALIZED,	/* initialized */
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
index 4190c5e9e66c..fcd11105fafa 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
@@ -3376,14 +3376,15 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *rule)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
-			     struct audit_context *actx)
+int selinux_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+			     void *vrule, struct audit_context *actx)
 {
 	struct selinux_state *state = &selinux_state;
 	struct context *ctxt;
 	struct mls_level *level;
 	struct selinux_audit_rule *rule = vrule;
 	int match = 0;
+	u32 sid;
 
 	if (unlikely(!rule)) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "selinux_audit_rule_match: missing rule\n");
@@ -3397,6 +3398,8 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	selinux_import_secid(l, &sid);
+
 	ctxt = sidtab_search(state->ss->sidtab, sid);
 	if (unlikely(!ctxt)) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "selinux_audit_rule_match: unrecognized SID %d\n",
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 0bed974b833b..d26a5e77a92c 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -4283,7 +4283,7 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
 
 /**
  * smack_audit_rule_match - Audit given object ?
- * @secid: security id for identifying the object to test
+ * @l: security id for identifying the object to test
  * @field: audit rule flags given from user-space
  * @op: required testing operator
  * @vrule: smack internal rule presentation
@@ -4292,11 +4292,12 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
  * The core Audit hook. It's used to take the decision of
  * whether to audit or not to audit a given object.
  */
-static int smack_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
-				  struct audit_context *actx)
+static int smack_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+				  void *vrule, struct audit_context *actx)
 {
 	struct smack_known *skp;
 	char *rule = vrule;
+	u32 secid;
 
 	if (unlikely(!rule)) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "Smack: missing rule\n");
@@ -4306,6 +4307,7 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
 	if (field != AUDIT_SUBJ_USER && field != AUDIT_OBJ_USER)
 		return 0;
 
+	smack_import_secid(l, &secid);
 	skp = smack_from_secid(secid);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.17.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-28 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 22:17 [PATCH 00/97] LSM: Complete module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:17 ` [PATCH 01/97] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-03-01 14:02   ` Edwin Zimmerman
2019-03-01 16:50     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:17 ` [PATCH 02/97] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:17 ` [PATCH 03/97] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key security blob Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 04/97] SCAFFOLD: Move sock_graft out of sock.h Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 05/97] LSM: Create an lsm_export data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-03-01 14:00   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-03-01 16:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 06/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the inode_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 07/97] SCAFFOLD: Move security.h out of route.h Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 08/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the cred_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 09/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the ipc_getsecid and task_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 10/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the sk_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 11/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the kernel_ask_as hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-03-01 14:59   ` Edwin Zimmerman
2019-03-01 16:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 12/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the getpeersec_dgram hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 14/97] LSM: Fix logical operation in lsm_export checks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 15/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 16/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 17/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 18/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 19/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_socket_getpeersec_dgram Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 20/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 21/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 22/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 23/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 24/97] LSM: FIXUP - security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 25/97] LSM: FIXUP - security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 26/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 27/97] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 28/97] LSM: REVERT Use lsm_export in the sk_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 29/97] Audit: Change audit_sig_sid to audit_sig_lsm Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 30/97] Audit: Convert target_sid to an lsm_export structure Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 31/97] Audit: Convert osid " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 32/97] IMA: Clean out lsm_export scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 33/97] NET: Store LSM access information in the socket blob for UDS Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 34/97] NET: Remove scaffolding on secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 35/97] NET: Remove scaffolding on new secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 36/97] NET: Remove netfilter scaffolding for lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 37/97] Netlabel: Replace secids with lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 38/97] LSM: Remove lsm_export scaffolding functions Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 39/97] IMA: FIXUP prototype using lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 40/97] Smack: Restore the release_secctx hook Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 41/97] AppArmor: Remove unnecessary hook stub Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 42/97] LSM: Limit calls to certain module hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 43/97] LSM: Create a data structure for a security context Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 44/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 45/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 46/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_getsecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 47/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_notifysecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 48/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in dentry_init_security hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 49/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 50/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_notifysecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 51/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 52/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 53/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in release_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 54/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_release_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 55/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 56/97] fs: remove lsm_context scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 57/97] LSM: Add the release function to the lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 58/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_setsecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 59/97] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 60/97] kernfs: remove lsm_context scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 61/97] LSM: Remove unused macro Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 62/97] LSM: Special handling for secctx lsm hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:18 ` [PATCH 63/97] SELinux: Use blob offset in current_sid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:19 ` [PATCH 64/97] LSM: Specify which LSM to display with /proc/self/attr/display Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:19 ` [PATCH 65/97] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:19 ` [PATCH 66/97] LSM: Add secmark_relabel_packet to the set of one call hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:19 ` [PATCH 67/97] LSM: Make getting the secmark right cleaner with lsm_export_one_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:19 ` [PATCH 68/97] netfilter: Fix memory leak introduced with lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:19 ` [PATCH 69/97] Smack: Consolidate secmark conversions Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:19 ` [PATCH 70/97] netfilter: Remove unnecessary NULL check in lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-03-01 14:17 ` [PATCH 00/97] LSM: Complete module stacking Stephen Smalley
2019-03-01 17:06   ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190228221933.2551-14-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).