From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:17:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906271007.4248A3AE@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cacf9eda-7486-80d3-f47d-b0dbb6872091@schaufler-ca.com>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:29:25AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 6/26/2019 8:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:22:28PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >> Replace the (secctx,seclen) pointer pair with a single
> >> lsmcontext pointer to allow return of the LSM identifier
> >> along with the context and context length. This allows
> >> security_release_secctx() to know how to release the
> >> context. Callers have been modified to use or save the
> >> returned data from the new structure.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/android/binder.c | 24 ++++++---------
> >> include/linux/security.h | 4 +--
> >> include/net/scm.h | 9 ++----
> >> kernel/audit.c | 29 +++++++-----------
> >> kernel/auditsc.c | 31 +++++++------------
> >> net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 7 ++---
> >> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 14 +++++----
> >> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 7 ++---
> >> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 5 +++-
> >> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 40 ++++++++-----------------
> >> net/netlabel/netlabel_user.c | 7 ++---
> >> security/security.c | 9 ++++--
> >> 12 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> >> index 89e574be34cc..5d417a7b9bb3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> >> @@ -2874,9 +2874,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
> >> binder_size_t last_fixup_min_off = 0;
> >> struct binder_context *context = proc->context;
> >> int t_debug_id = atomic_inc_return(&binder_last_id);
> >> - char *secctx = NULL;
> >> - u32 secctx_sz = 0;
> >> - struct lsmcontext scaff; /* scaffolding */
> >> + struct lsmcontext lsmctx;
> > As James found, this needs to be zero initialized:
> >
> > struct lsmcontext lsmctx = { };
>
> Thanks! I'll incorporate this in v5. It's great to
> have y'all checking it out.
I looked through other removed NULL assignments, and I think I see some
other issues...
binder_alloc_copy_to_buffer(&target_proc->alloc,
t->buffer, buf_offset,
- secctx, secctx_sz);
- security_release_secctx(secctx, secctx_sz);
- secctx = NULL;
+ lsmctx.context, lsmctx.len);
+ security_release_secctx(&lsmctx);
The new security_release_secctx() performs the zeroing if there is a
slot match... should it be unconditional? (And should the no-op version
also zero?)
@@ -2420,8 +2420,7 @@ nfsd4_encode_fattr(struct xdr_stream *xdr, struct
svc_fh *fhp,
__be32 status;
int err;
struct nfs4_acl *acl = NULL;
- void *context = NULL;
- int contextlen;
+ struct lsmcontext context;
This needs the same = { } to retain the same meaning.
And here:
@@ -1191,8 +1191,8 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
struct audit_buffer *ab;
u16 msg_type = nlh->nlmsg_type;
struct audit_sig_info *sig_data;
- char *ctx = NULL;
u32 len;
+ struct lsmcontext context;
And here:
@@ -2069,24 +2070,23 @@ void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char
*key)
int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
{
- char *ctx = NULL;
- unsigned len;
int error;
- u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob le;
+ struct lsmcontext context;
and here:
static int audit_log_pid_context(struct audit_context *context, pid_t
pid,
- kuid_t auid, kuid_t uid, unsigned int
sessionid,
- u32 sid, char *comm)
+ kuid_t auid, kuid_t uid,
+ unsigned int sessionid,
+ struct lsmblob *l, char *comm)
{
struct audit_buffer *ab;
- char *ctx = NULL;
- u32 len;
+ struct lsmcontext lsmctx;
Maybe here?
- if (osid) {
- char *ctx = NULL;
- u32 len;
- if (security_secid_to_secctx(osid, &ctx, &len))
{
- audit_log_format(ab, " osid=%u", osid);
+ if (lsmblob_is_set(olsm)) {
+ struct lsmcontext lsmcxt;
+ if (security_secid_to_secctx(olsm, &lsmcxt))
*call_panic = 1;
and:
- if (n->osid != 0) {
- char *ctx = NULL;
- u32 len;
+ if (lsmblob_is_set(&n->olsm)) {
+ struct lsmcontext lsmctx;
and:
@@ -395,7 +401,7 @@ nfqnl_build_packet_message(struct net *net, struct
nfqnl_instance *queue,
enum ip_conntrack_info uninitialized_var(ctinfo);
struct nfnl_ct_hook *nfnl_ct;
bool csum_verify;
- char *secdata = NULL;
+ struct lsmcontext context;
and:
@@ -387,8 +387,7 @@ int netlbl_unlhsh_add(struct net *net,
struct net_device *dev;
struct netlbl_unlhsh_iface *iface;
struct audit_buffer *audit_buf = NULL;
- char *secctx = NULL;
- u32 secctx_len;
+ struct lsmcontext context;
Sorry I forgot to check those the first time through!
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-26 19:22 [PATCH v4 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key blob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-27 17:43 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:45 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:47 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] net: Prepare UDS for secuirty module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:48 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:50 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:51 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:08 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:53 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:08 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:55 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:08 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:56 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:57 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 23:58 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:33 ` John Johansen
2019-06-28 14:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-28 16:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-28 18:08 ` John Johansen
[not found] ` <CAB9W1A1nwE7WBZqTe-GV8xNb83_B2ybV7cco++nfMjtDz9NJrg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-06-29 1:01 ` Fwd: " Stephen Smalley
2019-06-29 19:45 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-02 0:49 ` James Morris
2019-07-02 1:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:14 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:34 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] " Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 3:53 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 16:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27 17:17 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-06-27 17:36 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27 21:34 ` John Johansen
2019-06-27 21:36 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:34 ` John Johansen
2019-06-28 10:07 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:16 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:36 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:16 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:37 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] Audit: Store LSM audit information in an lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:16 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:37 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:18 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-06-26 23:18 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 2:22 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 3:28 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 3:44 ` John Johansen
2019-06-27 3:49 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 21:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 21:04 ` [PATCH v4 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Kees Cook
2019-06-26 21:11 ` John Johansen
2019-06-26 23:04 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-26 21:25 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27 2:41 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 2:46 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 3:45 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 4:10 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 17:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 18:10 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27 21:52 ` John Johansen
2019-06-27 22:33 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-27 23:16 ` James Morris
2019-06-27 23:44 ` John Johansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201906271007.4248A3AE@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).