From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v11 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:57:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113175721.2317-9-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113175721.2317-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
There may be more than one LSM that provides IPC data
for auditing. Change security_ipc_getsecid() to fill in
a lsmblob structure instead of the u32 secid. The
audit data structure containing the secid will be updated
later, so there is a bit of scaffolding here.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
include/linux/security.h | 7 ++++---
kernel/auditsc.c | 5 ++++-
security/security.c | 12 +++++++++---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index a3e99bccb1bb..9519b4fb43ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ int security_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5);
void security_task_to_inode(struct task_struct *p, struct inode *inode);
int security_ipc_permission(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, short flag);
-void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, u32 *secid);
+void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, struct lsmblob *blob);
int security_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *msg);
void security_msg_msg_free(struct msg_msg *msg);
int security_msg_queue_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq);
@@ -1172,9 +1172,10 @@ static inline int security_ipc_permission(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp,
return 0;
}
-static inline void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, u32 *secid)
+static inline void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp,
+ struct lsmblob *blob)
{
- *secid = 0;
+ lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
}
static inline int security_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *msg)
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 04803c3099b2..ce8bf2d8f8d2 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -2285,11 +2285,14 @@ void __audit_mq_getsetattr(mqd_t mqdes, struct mq_attr *mqstat)
void __audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
{
struct audit_context *context = audit_context();
+ struct lsmblob blob;
context->ipc.uid = ipcp->uid;
context->ipc.gid = ipcp->gid;
context->ipc.mode = ipcp->mode;
context->ipc.has_perm = 0;
- security_ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &context->ipc.osid);
+ security_ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &blob);
+ /* scaffolding on the [0] - change "osid" to a lsmblob */
+ context->ipc.osid = blob.secid[0];
context->type = AUDIT_IPC;
}
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 0fc75a31a6bb..b60c6a51f622 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1783,10 +1783,16 @@ int security_ipc_permission(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, short flag)
return call_int_hook(ipc_permission, 0, ipcp, flag);
}
-void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, u32 *secid)
+void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, struct lsmblob *blob)
{
- *secid = 0;
- call_void_hook(ipc_getsecid, ipcp, secid);
+ struct security_hook_list *hp;
+
+ lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
+ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.ipc_getsecid, list) {
+ if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+ continue;
+ hp->hook.ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+ }
}
int security_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *msg)
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191113175721.2317-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-11-13 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 02/25] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 5:36 ` James Morris
2019-11-13 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 5:38 ` James Morris
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 04/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 05/25] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 13/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 14/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 15/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 5:50 ` James Morris
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:19 [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:19 ` [PATCH v11 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:43 ` John Johansen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-13 16:50 [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 16:50 ` [PATCH v11 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191113175721.2317-9-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).