From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A45C3F2CD for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D5A21739 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="FQPR4T3f" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729286AbgCDPYy (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:24:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:40900 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729169AbgCDPYx (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:24:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id e26so2282277wme.5 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 07:24:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZmLS9qnO1Q66v/wtUwX9VxbxLnQwytCVRya2k8J6vNI=; b=FQPR4T3fjY4rOCvwbAQ0z8QbhMr1ZjWh/xFw9Lzc6W6+ZG7u3WI8Ah6jcGVr/7iX06 PwPe9WEyKHVL3xuyryUBVKXmU47z4QmcSlCbFjOVUp4BD1ILDAbH8mc0KFDN/IyJyIUA UCIVqbT+3CO8S6wCXr7gfGksuTKj7jCzv4fV8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZmLS9qnO1Q66v/wtUwX9VxbxLnQwytCVRya2k8J6vNI=; b=m8tUR1syDUoMqUKuQli3K2+u83Lu3MegYVGFrDDkZ34YeqQGI4pTHIHPdwUPBJKUBf N2RNB0AXI8tWl7bSeVOpNIork0dPxbNFbpO/szAkAbRWURszvfYdssyG7zXbLBlJEY94 qI8cO67Y/zOfgwJ4nqenSMX57/phPm0GjpPF62OivM8UNcwbw0bxJLfBZqjDyuCMMt+J /5gaYtAxn/r6SXTFBqsofOJ7V2at1UMCuNmeFEoVRrDUyLCeyjkxK2JFFtrgZ46+ZIi6 dYJVc4r22U3oU9TbM0YDE1m0jzFa0vZ7UBqM+jNhHhKLW/1t8oxpSTWzvgfMEOrlXdcA Tg3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3HTwpkrGSXP1FFGlVn5xlg4IUsOxTDlx6WGgWaBG/kt7rqDRP4 P3AidRe71hVdl2bgKaRTLkRZVw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtzSljSP9Rf+4htWw0ktNMsb3VloEd6kKjoSEQOggRPiPdIX37a5amcCVkEUychGquYG0F2wg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c857:: with SMTP id c23mr4209940wml.68.1583335492265; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 07:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2a00:79e0:42:204:8a21:ba0c:bb42:75ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm4687059wmk.31.2020.03.04.07.24.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Mar 2020 07:24:51 -0800 (PST) From: KP Singh X-Google-Original-From: KP Singh Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:50 +0100 To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: KP Singh , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, open list , bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Paul Turner , Jann Horn , Florent Revest , Brendan Jackman Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: JIT helpers for fmod_ret progs Message-ID: <20200304152450.GA53576@google.com> References: <20200304015528.29661-1-kpsingh@chromium.org> <20200304015528.29661-3-kpsingh@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On 03-Mar 20:52, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:56 PM KP Singh wrote: > > > > From: KP Singh > > > > * Split the invoke_bpf program to prepare for special handling of > > fmod_ret programs introduced in a subsequent patch. > > * Move the definition of emit_cond_near_jump and emit_nops as they are > > needed for fmod_ret. > > * Refactor branch target alignment into its own function > > align16_branch_target. I updated this as well, as we changed it to emit_align. - KP > > > > Signed-off-by: KP Singh > > --- > > I trust invoke_bpf_prog logic didn't change, code was just moved around, right? > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko > > > > arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) > > > > [...]