From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909BEC433E1 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713E02078E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730081AbgFONsK (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:48:10 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33536 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729243AbgFONsJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:48:09 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8076068BFE; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:48:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:48:04 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , Ian Kent , David Howells , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] fs: check FMODE_WRITE in __kernel_write Message-ID: <20200615134804.GA11061@lst.de> References: <20200615121257.798894-1-hch@lst.de> <20200615121257.798894-6-hch@lst.de> <20200615123439.GT8681@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200615123439.GT8681@bombadil.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:34:39AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:12:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > We still need to check if the fѕ is open write, even for the low-level > > helper. > > Do we need the analogous check for FMODE_READ in the __kernel_read() > patch? Yes, we should probably grow it. Hoping that none of the caller actually wants to mess with files not open for reading as some of them are rather dodgy.