From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v19 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:32:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724203226.16374-4-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724203226.16374-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.
Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
lsmblob instead of a u32. The scaffolding function lsmblob_init()
fills the blob with the value of the old secid, ensuring that
it is available to the appropriate module hook. The sources of
the secid, security_task_getsecid() and security_inode_getsecid(),
will be converted to use the blob structure later in the series.
At the point the use of lsmblob_init() is dropped.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
include/linux/security.h | 7 ++++---
kernel/auditfilter.c | 6 ++++--
kernel/auditsc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 4 ++--
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 7 +++++--
security/security.c | 10 ++++++++--
6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 591dae299c6f..294410533b51 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1878,7 +1878,8 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule);
int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule);
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+ void **lsmrule);
void security_audit_rule_free(void **lsmrule);
#else
@@ -1894,8 +1895,8 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
return 0;
}
-static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
- void **lsmrule)
+static inline int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+ u32 op, void **lsmrule)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index f9a632ae7be1..15a7fb80d6a7 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1331,6 +1331,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
pid_t pid;
u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
switch (f->type) {
case AUDIT_PID:
@@ -1361,8 +1362,9 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
if (f->lsm_isset) {
security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
- f->type, f->op,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(
+ &blob, f->type, f->op,
f->lsm_rules);
}
break;
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index bafa03a5c866..975c3b8c8d0d 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
const struct cred *cred;
int i, need_sid = 1;
u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
unsigned int sessionid;
cred = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->cred, tsk == current || task_creation);
@@ -654,7 +655,9 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
need_sid = 0;
}
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
+ f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rules);
}
@@ -669,15 +672,17 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (f->lsm_isset) {
/* Find files that match */
if (name) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
result = security_audit_rule_match(
- name->osid,
+ &blob,
f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rules);
} else if (ctx) {
list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
if (security_audit_rule_match(
- n->osid,
+ &blob,
f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rules)) {
@@ -689,7 +694,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
/* Find ipc objects that match */
if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
break;
- if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, ctx->ipc.osid);
+ if (security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
f->type, f->op,
f->lsm_rules))
++result;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index 9d94080bdad8..d72af93f8d6f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
return -EINVAL;
}
-static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
- void *lsmrule)
+static inline int security_filter_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+ u32 op, void *lsmrule)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index a442b8940e93..9a0f462e8891 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
int rc = 0;
u32 osid;
+ struct lsmblob lsmdata;
if (!ima_lsm_isset(rule->lsm[i].rules)) {
if (!rule->lsm[i].args_p)
@@ -492,7 +493,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
- rc = security_filter_rule_match(osid,
+ lsmblob_init(&lsmdata, osid);
+ rc = security_filter_rule_match(&lsmdata,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
rule->lsm[i].rules);
@@ -500,7 +502,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
- rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
+ lsmblob_init(&lsmdata, secid);
+ rc = security_filter_rule_match(&lsmdata,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
rule->lsm[i].rules);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 17d701cd7f69..f9a249a93215 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2542,11 +2542,14 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void **lsmrule)
hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_free, list) {
if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
continue;
+ if (lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot] == NULL)
+ continue;
hp->hook.audit_rule_free(lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
}
}
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule)
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+ void **lsmrule)
{
struct security_hook_list *hp;
int rc;
@@ -2554,7 +2557,10 @@ int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule)
hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) {
if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
continue;
- rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(secid, field, op,
+ if (lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot] == NULL)
+ continue;
+ rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
+ field, op,
&lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200724203226.16374-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 16:12 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-07-27 21:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 19:50 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 10:34 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 10:57 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 06/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 11:11 ` John Johansen
2020-07-28 23:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-29 0:30 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 13/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 20:36 ` James Morris
2020-07-27 20:40 ` John Johansen
2020-07-28 18:29 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 20:13 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 20:28 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 20:37 ` James Morris
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 19/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30 8:40 ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 20/23] Audit: Add new record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 19:04 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 21/23] Audit: Add a new record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 20:40 ` James Morris
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30 10:03 ` John Johansen
2020-07-30 20:44 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30 20:57 ` John Johansen
2020-07-30 22:22 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30 9:23 ` John Johansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200724203226.16374-4-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).