linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
	sds@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v26 05/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 13:07:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210513200807.15910-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513200807.15910-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.

Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
lsmblob instead of a u32. The scaffolding function lsmblob_init()
fills the blob with the value of the old secid, ensuring that
it is available to the appropriate module hook. The sources of
the secid, security_task_getsecid() and security_inode_getsecid(),
will be converted to use the blob structure later in the series.
At the point the use of lsmblob_init() is dropped.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/security.h            |  7 ++++---
 kernel/auditfilter.c                |  6 ++++--
 kernel/auditsc.c                    | 16 +++++++++++-----
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h        |  4 ++--
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |  7 +++++--
 security/security.c                 | 10 ++++++++--
 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index ca9485105f00..916a0f606035 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1944,7 +1944,8 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
 int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule);
 int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule);
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+			      void **lsmrule);
 void security_audit_rule_free(void **lsmrule);
 
 #else
@@ -1960,8 +1961,8 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
-					    void **lsmrule)
+static inline int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+					    u32 op, void **lsmrule)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index a2340e81cfa7..6a04d762d272 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1331,6 +1331,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
 			struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
 			pid_t pid;
 			u32 sid;
+			struct lsmblob blob;
 
 			switch (f->type) {
 			case AUDIT_PID:
@@ -1362,8 +1363,9 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
 				if (f->lsm_isset) {
 					security_task_getsecid_subj(current,
 								    &sid);
-					result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
-						   f->type, f->op,
+					lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+					result = security_audit_rule_match(
+						   &blob, f->type, f->op,
 						   f->lsm_rules);
 				}
 				break;
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 392afe3e2fd6..71d894dcdc01 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	const struct cred *cred;
 	int i, need_sid = 1;
 	u32 sid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	unsigned int sessionid;
 
 	cred = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->cred, tsk == current || task_creation);
@@ -670,8 +671,10 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 					security_task_getsecid_subj(tsk, &sid);
 					need_sid = 0;
 				}
-				result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
-							f->op, f->lsm_rules);
+				lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+				result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
+							f->type, f->op,
+							f->lsm_rules);
 			}
 			break;
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_USER:
@@ -684,15 +687,17 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 			if (f->lsm_isset) {
 				/* Find files that match */
 				if (name) {
+					lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
 					result = security_audit_rule_match(
-								name->osid,
+								&blob,
 								f->type,
 								f->op,
 								f->lsm_rules);
 				} else if (ctx) {
 					list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
+						lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
 						if (security_audit_rule_match(
-								n->osid,
+								&blob,
 								f->type,
 								f->op,
 								f->lsm_rules)) {
@@ -704,7 +709,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 				/* Find ipc objects that match */
 				if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
 					break;
-				if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
+				lsmblob_init(&blob, ctx->ipc.osid);
+				if (security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
 							      f->type, f->op,
 							      f->lsm_rules))
 					++result;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index f0e448ed1f9f..55f3bd4f0b01 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ static inline void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
 {
 }
 
-static inline int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
-					void *lsmrule)
+static inline int ima_filter_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+					u32 op, void *lsmrule)
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index d804b9a0dd95..a05841e1012b 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
 		int rc = 0;
 		u32 osid;
+		struct lsmblob lsmdata;
 
 		if (!ima_lsm_isset(rule, i)) {
 			if (!rule->lsm[i].args_p)
@@ -619,14 +620,16 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
 		case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
 		case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
 			security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
-			rc = ima_filter_rule_match(osid, rule->lsm[i].type,
+			lsmblob_init(&lsmdata, osid);
+			rc = ima_filter_rule_match(&lsmdata, rule->lsm[i].type,
 						   Audit_equal,
 						   rule->lsm[i].rule);
 			break;
 		case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
 		case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
 		case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
-			rc = ima_filter_rule_match(secid, rule->lsm[i].type,
+			lsmblob_init(&lsmdata, secid);
+			rc = ima_filter_rule_match(&lsmdata, rule->lsm[i].type,
 						   Audit_equal,
 						   rule->lsm[i].rule);
 			break;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 9471bcecc052..a5793b4bf684 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2669,11 +2669,14 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void **lsmrule)
 	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_free, list) {
 		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
 			continue;
+		if (lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot] == NULL)
+			continue;
 		hp->hook.audit_rule_free(lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
 	}
 }
 
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule)
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+			      void **lsmrule)
 {
 	struct security_hook_list *hp;
 	int rc;
@@ -2681,7 +2684,10 @@ int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule)
 	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) {
 		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
 			continue;
-		rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(secid, field, op,
+		if (lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot] == NULL)
+			continue;
+		rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
+					       field, op,
 					       &lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
 		if (rc)
 			return rc;
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-13 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210513200807.15910-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2021-05-13 20:07 ` [PATCH v26 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 02/25] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2021-05-22  8:39     ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-05-25 23:52       ` Casey Schaufler
2021-05-26  9:53         ` Mickaël Salaün
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 03/25] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2021-05-14 19:00     ` Kees Cook
2021-05-21 20:18     ` Paul Moore
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 04/25] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2021-05-14 19:00     ` Kees Cook
2021-05-13 20:07   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2021-05-14 19:03     ` Kees Cook
2021-05-21 20:18     ` Paul Moore
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-05-14 19:05     ` Kees Cook
2021-05-21 20:18     ` Paul Moore
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 13/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 14/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2021-05-14 19:23     ` Kees Cook
2021-05-17 19:52       ` Casey Schaufler
2021-05-21 20:19         ` Paul Moore
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 15/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2021-05-21 20:19     ` Paul Moore
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:07   ` [PATCH v26 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2021-05-14 19:24     ` Kees Cook
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2021-05-21 20:19     ` Paul Moore
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 21/25] audit: add support for non-syscall auxiliary records Casey Schaufler
2021-05-21 20:19     ` Paul Moore
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 22/25] Audit: Add new record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2021-05-21 20:19     ` Paul Moore
2021-05-21 21:26       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-05-21 22:05       ` Casey Schaufler
2021-05-22  2:20         ` Paul Moore
2021-05-22 12:58           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-05-25 16:26       ` Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 23/25] Audit: Add a new record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2021-05-13 20:08   ` [PATCH v26 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210513200807.15910-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).