From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, paul@paul-moore.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
jmorris@namei.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v38 12/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:53:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220927195421.14713-13-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220927195421.14713-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.
Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
lsmblob instead of a u32. The scaffolding function lsmblob_init()
fills the blob with the value of the old secid, ensuring that
it is available to the appropriate module hook. The sources of
the secid, security_task_getsecid() and security_inode_getsecid(),
will be converted to use the blob structure later in the series.
At the point the use of lsmblob_init() is dropped.
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
---
include/linux/security.h | 5 +++--
kernel/auditfilter.c | 6 ++++--
kernel/auditsc.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
security/security.c | 5 +++--
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 6ee00f3a10a7..3fe04958f7fb 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules);
int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules);
void security_audit_rule_free(struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules);
@@ -1999,7 +1999,8 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
return 0;
}
-static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
+static inline int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob,
+ u32 field, u32 op,
struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index de75bd6ad866..15cd4fe35e9c 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1337,6 +1337,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
for (i = 0; i < e->rule.field_count; i++) {
struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
+ struct lsmblob blob;
pid_t pid;
u32 sid;
@@ -1369,8 +1370,9 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
if (f->lsm_str) {
security_current_getsecid_subj(&sid);
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
- f->type, f->op,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(
+ &blob, f->type, f->op,
&f->lsm_rules);
}
break;
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 482805f6ea68..5fab2367bfd0 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
const struct cred *cred;
int i, need_sid = 1;
u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
unsigned int sessionid;
if (ctx && rule->prio <= ctx->prio)
@@ -678,8 +679,10 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
security_current_getsecid_subj(&sid);
need_sid = 0;
}
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
- f->op, &f->lsm_rules);
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
+ f->type, f->op,
+ &f->lsm_rules);
}
break;
case AUDIT_OBJ_USER:
@@ -692,15 +695,17 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (f->lsm_str) {
/* Find files that match */
if (name) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
result = security_audit_rule_match(
- name->osid,
+ &blob,
f->type,
f->op,
&f->lsm_rules);
} else if (ctx) {
list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, n->osid);
if (security_audit_rule_match(
- n->osid, f->type, f->op,
+ &blob, f->type, f->op,
&f->lsm_rules)) {
++result;
break;
@@ -710,7 +715,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
/* Find ipc objects that match */
if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
break;
- if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, ctx->ipc.osid);
+ if (security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
f->type, f->op,
&f->lsm_rules))
++result;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index b74debe82d82..96faeff2c73b 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2720,7 +2720,7 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules)
}
}
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules)
{
struct security_hook_list *hp;
@@ -2731,7 +2731,8 @@ int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
continue;
if (lsmrules->rule[hp->lsmid->slot] == NULL)
continue;
- rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(secid, field, op,
+ rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
+ field, op,
&lsmrules->rule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-27 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220927195421.14713-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 00/39] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 01/39] LSM: Identify modules by more than name Casey Schaufler
2022-10-12 21:14 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-03-03 15:17 ` Georgia Garcia
2023-03-03 16:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 02/39] LSM: Add an LSM identifier for external use Casey Schaufler
2022-10-12 21:14 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-10-20 22:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-03-03 17:14 ` Georgia Garcia
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 03/39] LSM: Identify the process attributes for each module Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 04/39] LSM: Maintain a table of LSM attribute data Casey Schaufler
2022-10-13 10:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-10-20 23:42 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-10-23 7:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-10-23 10:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-10-23 17:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-10-23 17:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-10-24 15:13 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-10-24 16:37 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-10-25 9:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 05/39] proc: Use lsmids instead of lsm names for attrs Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 06/39] LSM: lsm_self_attr syscall for LSM self attributes Casey Schaufler
2022-09-28 11:04 ` kernel test robot
2022-10-12 21:16 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-10-20 15:44 ` Paul Moore
2022-10-20 16:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 07/39] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 08/39] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-10-12 21:17 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 09/39] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-10-12 21:18 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 10/39] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 11/39] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 13/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 14/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 15/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 16/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:53 ` [PATCH v38 17/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 18/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 19/39] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 20/39] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-10-12 21:19 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 21/39] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 22/39] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 23/39] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 24/39] Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 25/39] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 26/39] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 27/39] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 28/39] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 29/39] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 30/39] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 31/39] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 32/39] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 33/39] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 34/39] audit: multiple subject lsm values for netlabel Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 35/39] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 36/39] netlabel: Use a struct lsmblob in audit data Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 37/39] LSM: Removed scaffolding function lsmcontext_init Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 19:54 ` [PATCH v38 38/39] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-09-27 20:31 ` [PATCH v38 39/39] LSM: Create lsm_module_list system call Casey Schaufler
2022-09-28 14:27 ` kernel test robot
2022-10-12 21:19 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-10-20 20:28 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-10-12 22:04 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-25 0:39 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220927195421.14713-13-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).