From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62968C47082 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D8B613CE for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235335AbhEZPNj (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 11:13:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:22120 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235350AbhEZPNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 11:13:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622041922; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/N0k31CwuQKGZMx5f/+9dk+RsNYm2+HO5x/7A80J9dM=; b=UA0YmmpHySQLXSxM3FNtMNH/tCBa1DmkhKF/rm2+g+H5ztaMQI+OAoBOsolTA3BsyVO5EO eZFznq0kqTrdFF0s1zSJwDPkzXTqi2NIzrnKdOjxjo+1TcD2wA6r5e/a47jXOnE8HtrVI3 eD5maXw66k2g92IQqkD4Xen0TsZ20ro= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-376-ofiMDKPWNRCg6bvvbMeH9g-1; Wed, 26 May 2021 11:11:58 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ofiMDKPWNRCg6bvvbMeH9g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9313610082E1; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x2.localnet (ovpn-119-19.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.119.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CA961094; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:11:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Steve Grubb To: Pavel Begunkov , linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: Jens Axboe , selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Paul Moore Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] audit,io_uring,io-wq: add some basic audit support to io_uring Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 11:11:50 -0400 Message-ID: <2197994.ElGaqSPkdT@x2> Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: References: <162163367115.8379.8459012634106035341.stgit@sifl> <0a668302-b170-31ce-1651-ddf45f63d02a@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Wednesday, May 26, 2021 10:38:38 AM EDT Paul Moore wrote: > > > We would need to check with the current security requirements (there > > > are distro people on the linux-audit list that keep track of that > > > stuff), The requirements generally care about resource access. File open, connect, accept, etc. We don't care about read/write itself as that would flood the analysis. > > > but looking at the opcodes right now my gut feeling is that > > > most of the opcodes would be considered "security relevant" so > > > selective auditing might not be that useful in practice. I'd say maybe a quarter to a third look interesting. > > > It would > > > definitely clutter the code and increase the chances that new opcodes > > > would not be properly audited when they are merged. There is that... > > I'm curious, why it's enabled by many distros by default? Are there > > use cases they use? > > We've already talked about certain users and environments where audit > is an important requirement, e.g. public sector, health care, > financial institutions, etc.; without audit Linux wouldn't be an > option for these users, People that care about auditing are under regulatory mandates. They care more about the audit event than the performance. Imagine you have a system with some brand new medical discovery. You want to know anyone who accesses the information in case it gets leaked out. You don't care how slow the system gets - you simply *have* to know everyone who's looked at the documents. -Steve