Linux-Security-Module Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:40:53 -0800
Message-ID: <2aa8a330-ff38-7795-c875-da718e150170@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113181925.2437-4-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On 11/13/19 10:19 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
> to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
> lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.
> 
> Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
> lsmblob instead of a u32. In some cases this requires a
> temporary conversion using lsmblob_init() that will go
> away when other interfaces get converted.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/security.h            |  7 ++++---
>  kernel/auditfilter.c                |  7 +++++--
>  kernel/auditsc.c                    | 14 ++++++++++----
>  security/integrity/ima/ima.h        |  4 ++--
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |  7 +++++--
>  security/security.c                 | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 5eced28fa0c9..2df58448f1f2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -1835,7 +1835,8 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
>  int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule);
>  int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
> -int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule);
> +int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
> +			      void *lsmrule);
>  void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule);
>  
>  #else
> @@ -1851,8 +1852,8 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
> -					    void *lsmrule)
> +static inline int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
> +					    u32 op, void *lsmrule)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index b0126e9c0743..356db1dd276c 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
>  			struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
>  			pid_t pid;
>  			u32 sid;
> +			struct lsmblob blob;
>  
>  			switch (f->type) {
>  			case AUDIT_PID:
> @@ -1355,8 +1356,10 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
>  			case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
>  				if (f->lsm_rule) {
>  					security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
> -					result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
> -						   f->type, f->op, f->lsm_rule);
> +					lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
> +					result = security_audit_rule_match(
> +							&blob, f->type,
> +							f->op, f->lsm_rule);
>  				}
>  				break;
>  			case AUDIT_EXE:
> diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> index 4effe01ebbe2..7566e5b1c419 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  	const struct cred *cred;
>  	int i, need_sid = 1;
>  	u32 sid;
> +	struct lsmblob blob;
>  	unsigned int sessionid;
>  
>  	cred = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->cred, tsk == current || task_creation);
> @@ -643,7 +644,9 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  					security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
>  					need_sid = 0;
>  				}
> -				result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
> +				lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
> +				result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
> +								   f->type,
>  								   f->op,
>  								   f->lsm_rule);
>  			}
> @@ -658,15 +661,17 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  			if (f->lsm_rule) {
>  				/* Find files that match */
>  				if (name) {
> +					lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
>  					result = security_audit_rule_match(
> -								name->osid,
> +								&blob,
>  								f->type,
>  								f->op,
>  								f->lsm_rule);
>  				} else if (ctx) {
>  					list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
> +						lsmblob_init(&blob, n->osid);
>  						if (security_audit_rule_match(
> -								n->osid,
> +								&blob,
>  								f->type,
>  								f->op,
>  								f->lsm_rule)) {
> @@ -678,7 +683,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  				/* Find ipc objects that match */
>  				if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
>  					break;
> -				if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
> +				lsmblob_init(&blob, ctx->ipc.osid);
> +				if (security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
>  							      f->type, f->op,
>  							      f->lsm_rule))
>  					++result;
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index 3689081aaf38..5bcd6011ef8c 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
> -					     void *lsmrule)
> +static inline int security_filter_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
> +					     u32 op, void *lsmrule)
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 5380aca2b351..7711cc6a3fe3 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
>  		int rc = 0;
>  		u32 osid;
> +		struct lsmblob blob;
>  
>  		if (!rule->lsm[i].rule)
>  			continue;
> @@ -423,7 +424,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
>  		case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
>  		case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
>  			security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
> -			rc = security_filter_rule_match(osid,
> +			lsmblob_init(&blob, osid);
> +			rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
>  							rule->lsm[i].type,
>  							Audit_equal,
>  							rule->lsm[i].rule);
> @@ -431,7 +433,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
>  		case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
>  		case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
>  		case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
> -			rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
> +			lsmblob_init(&blob, secid);
> +			rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
>  							rule->lsm[i].type,
>  							Audit_equal,
>  							rule->lsm[i].rule);
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 5f503cadf7f3..7c386cbe4cf3 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
>  /*
>   * Current index to use while initializing the lsmblob secid list.
>   */
> -static int lsm_slot __initdata;
> +static int lsm_slot __lsm_ro_after_init;
>  
>  /**
>   * security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
> @@ -2412,9 +2412,21 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
>  	call_void_hook(audit_rule_free, lsmrule);
>  }
>  
> -int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule)
> +int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
> +			      void *lsmrule)
>  {
> -	return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule);
> +	struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) {
> +		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
> +			continue;
> +		rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
> +					       field, op, lsmrule);
> +		if (rc != 0)
> +			return rc;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
>  
> 


  reply index

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191113181925.2437-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-11-13 18:19 ` [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:39     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 02/25] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:40     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:40     ` John Johansen [this message]
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 04/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:41     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 05/25] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:41     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:42     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:42     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:43     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:43     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:44     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:44     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 18:45     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 13/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 14/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:00     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 15/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:00     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:19   ` [PATCH v11 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:56 [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21  5:38   ` James Morris
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-13 16:50 [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 16:50 ` [PATCH v11 03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2aa8a330-ff38-7795-c875-da718e150170@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Security-Module Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/0 linux-security-module/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-security-module linux-security-module/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module \
		linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-security-module

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git