From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
jlayton@redhat.com, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] VFS: Add additional RESOLVE_* flags [ver #18]
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:25:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <580352.1583825105@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiEBNFJ0_riJnpuUXTO7+_HByVo-R3pGoB_84qv3LzHxA@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > Also make openat2() handle RESOLVE_NO_TRAILING_SYMLINKS.
>
> No, please let's not do this.
>
> We have O_NOFOLLOW, and we can't get rid of it.
>
> So adding RESOLVE_NO_TRAILING_SYMLINKS isn't a cleanup. It's just
> extra complexity for absolutely zero gain.
Okay. So what's the equivalent of AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW in RESOLVE_* flag
terms? RESOLVE_NO_SYMLINKS is not equivalent, though O_NOFOLLOW is. The
reason I ask is that RESOLVE_* flags can't be easily extended to non-open
syscalls that don't take O_* flags without it. Would you prefer that new
non-open syscalls continue to take AT_* and ignore RESOLVE_* flags? That
would be fine by me.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 14:00 [PATCH 00/14] VFS: Filesystem information [ver #18] David Howells
2020-03-09 14:00 ` [PATCH 01/14] VFS: Add additional RESOLVE_* flags " David Howells
2020-03-09 20:56 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-03-09 21:13 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <20200310005549.adrn3yf4mbljc5f6@yavin>
2020-03-10 1:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-10 7:25 ` David Howells [this message]
2020-03-11 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-12 9:08 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-03-12 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-12 17:11 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-03-12 19:37 ` Al Viro
2020-03-12 21:48 ` Jeremy Allison
[not found] ` <20200313095901.tdv4vl7envypgqfz@yavin>
2020-03-13 16:48 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-03-13 18:28 ` Al Viro
2020-03-13 18:35 ` Jeremy Allison
2020-03-16 14:20 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-03-12 19:25 ` Al Viro
2020-03-12 16:56 ` David Howells
2020-03-12 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 02/14] fsinfo: Add fsinfo() syscall to query filesystem information " David Howells
2020-03-10 9:31 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-10 9:32 ` [PATCH v19 01/14] fsinfo: Add fsinfo() syscall to query filesystem information Christian Brauner
2020-03-10 9:32 ` [PATCH v19 14/14] arch: wire up fsinfo syscall Christian Brauner
2020-03-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 03/14] fsinfo: Provide a bitmap of supported features [ver #18] David Howells
2020-03-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 04/14] fsinfo: Allow retrieval of superblock devname, options and stats " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 05/14] fsinfo: Allow fsinfo() to look up a mount object by ID " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 06/14] fsinfo: Add a uniquifier ID to struct mount " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 07/14] fsinfo: Allow mount information to be queried " David Howells
2020-03-10 9:04 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-09 14:02 ` [PATCH 08/14] fsinfo: Allow the mount topology propogation flags to be retrieved " David Howells
2020-03-10 8:42 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-09 14:02 ` [PATCH 09/14] fsinfo: Provide notification overrun handling support " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:02 ` [PATCH 10/14] fsinfo: sample: Mount listing program " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:02 ` [PATCH 11/14] fsinfo: Add API documentation " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:02 ` [PATCH 12/14] fsinfo: Add support for AFS " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:02 ` [PATCH 13/14] fsinfo: Example support for Ext4 " David Howells
2020-03-09 14:02 ` [PATCH 14/14] fsinfo: Example support for NFS " David Howells
2020-03-09 17:50 ` [PATCH 00/14] VFS: Filesystem information " Jeff Layton
2020-03-09 19:22 ` Andres Freund
2020-03-09 22:49 ` Jeff Layton
2020-03-10 0:18 ` Andres Freund
2020-03-09 20:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-09 22:52 ` David Howells
2020-03-10 9:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=580352.1583825105@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=metze@samba.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).