linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] apparmor: test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:26:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a81c546-e4c5-dc7c-1853-ec4ae4600102@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513193204.816681-9-davidgow@google.com>

On 5/13/21 12:32 PM, David Gow wrote:
> With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros
> removed, several casts in policy_unpack_test are no longer required.
> 
> Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

I have pulled this into the apparmor tree

> ---
> This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
> first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
> the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
> particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
> 
>  security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> index 533137f45361..03f78a41ef79 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
>  
>  	array_size = unpack_array(puf->e, name);
>  
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, (u16)0);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, 0);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos,
>  		puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET);
>  }
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
>  	size = unpack_strdup(puf->e, &string, TEST_STRING_NAME);
>  
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, string, (char *)NULL);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, string, NULL);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, start);
>  }
>  
> @@ -391,10 +391,10 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_basic(struct kunit *test)
>  
>  	size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
>  
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, (void *)chunk,
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk,
>  			    puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET + 2);
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)TEST_U16_DATA);
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, (void *)(chunk + TEST_U16_DATA));
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, TEST_U16_DATA);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, (chunk + TEST_U16_DATA));
>  }
>  
>  static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1(
> @@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1(
>  
>  	size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
>  
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->end - 1);
>  }
>  
> @@ -430,8 +430,8 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_2(
>  
>  	size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
>  
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET);
>  }
>  
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210513193204.816681-1-davidgow@google.com>
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] apparmor: test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required David Gow
2021-06-15 20:40   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-06-15 21:26   ` John Johansen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a81c546-e4c5-dc7c-1853-ec4ae4600102@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).