linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: Linux Security Module list 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	SElinux list <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vfs/security/NFS/btrfs: clean up and fix LSM option handling
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:43:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFqZXNtcMsTMDtT3pvRNp31UPGUgDzz6DPSC+uw=1LRvLrVspw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53c532c8-fecf-ff13-ac82-7755f11a087d@schaufler-ca.com>

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 7:00 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> On 4/9/2021 4:12 AM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > This series attempts to clean up part of the mess that has grown around
> > the LSM mount option handling across different subsystems.
> >
> > The original motivation was to fix a NFS+SELinux bug that I found while
> > trying to get the NFS part of the selinux-testsuite [1] to work, which
> > is fixed by patch 2.
> >
> > The first patch paves the way for the second one by eliminating the
> > special case workaround in selinux_set_mnt_opts(), while also
> > simplifying BTRFS's LSM mount option handling.
> >
> > I tested the patches by running the NFS part of the SELinux testsuite
> > (which is now fully passing). I also added the pending patch for
> > broken BTRFS LSM options support with fsconfig(2) [2] and ran the
> > proposed BTRFS SELinux tests for selinux-testsuite [3] (still passing
> > with all patches).
>
> The Smack testsuite can be found at:
>         https://github.com/smack-team/smack-testsuite.git
>
> It might provide another layer of confidence.

Thanks, but that doesn't seem to exercise mounting/remounting btrfs
nor nfs with security options. Anything else should be unaffected.

>
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/20210401065403.GA1363493@infradead.org/T/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/20201103110121.53919-2-richard_c_haines@btinternet.com/
> >     ^^ the original patch no longer applies - a rebased version is here:
> >     https://github.com/WOnder93/selinux-testsuite/commit/212e76b5bd0775c7507c1996bd172de3bcbff139.patch
> >
> > Ondrej Mosnacek (2):
> >   vfs,LSM: introduce the FS_HANDLES_LSM_OPTS flag
> >   selinux: fix SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS flag handling on double mount
> >
> >  fs/btrfs/super.c         | 35 ++++++-----------------------------
> >  fs/nfs/fs_context.c      |  6 ++++--
> >  fs/super.c               | 10 ++++++----
> >  include/linux/fs.h       |  3 ++-
> >  security/selinux/hooks.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> >
>


-- 
Ondrej Mosnacek
Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel
Red Hat, Inc.


      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09 11:12 [PATCH 0/2] vfs/security/NFS/btrfs: clean up and fix LSM option handling Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs,LSM: introduce the FS_HANDLES_LSM_OPTS flag Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] selinux: fix SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS flag handling on double mount Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 12:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] vfs/security/NFS/btrfs: clean up and fix LSM option handling Al Viro
2021-04-09 17:39   ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-05-17 13:46     ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2021-04-09 17:00 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-04-09 17:43   ` Ondrej Mosnacek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFqZXNtcMsTMDtT3pvRNp31UPGUgDzz6DPSC+uw=1LRvLrVspw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).