From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD90EC43387 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 01:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9122070B for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 01:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="ed5Qgup3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727145AbfAHB3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:29:37 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com ([209.85.217.66]:44176 "EHLO mail-vs1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727084AbfAHB3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:29:37 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id z23so1479557vsj.11 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:29:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aTdBtTEZCH/4iLJe/wIuUIn2iqxr4uAZKAK+z38oRWo=; b=ed5Qgup3bl3nLcXUfRsdaHxDIHgv0UGGfg13G694FdL30YmQZTKYrWx1Mxcpo0P7Nj rgF6F8IR0SRhpRCy7RIciGWGpNb74NNdQ5dvKg7E0ncvussiYxVlZazzYN9kx0wUWTK3 qfDC6G91dqkfO630DzyjXfDSllYU4GhBEsJPY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aTdBtTEZCH/4iLJe/wIuUIn2iqxr4uAZKAK+z38oRWo=; b=TWF28JnBB9LRgun4l6kTlHsbqf08sp2fRFphzjXsxA5UeIJM/Y14vLRcmw3uUEOEBL OXlfi66ccr3FNJYdTRpTCHJ+NMjkpiwdurtUaMnuU0U0FPMjFFxGp2tIL3rIdUIOHv9H BFa1+HinSNO/nvLLWbAuKOALnRglcdQv0HZnBCfq5ZsvbZL/SXA1LPnqqpkgpdm/n0p8 5s567P0yny4MeSIMcmE+b9bPQDRzNr2BteyL+F3/U/MFFlMG/XSN7VQyT3JIZ7SoL4ph 0ZKpiVfxqZ1t0RRzswBu5DakV++P5V3YJ+GBlHbRafTbI4w2XTCM7HGIbm+TVYX8Wxmp kjGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbkVScfEDeL2INq3qruOaX9uWBB5ObsGId9eTuPWXC04KmWx7IC 8MoT1w262CA7PsttvR1eAJHB9dEFbeQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UQW0p1a7NTRlas1HPsBxMSy3znqECJdeb/HjfunZQ5MRnzJwwrsA9uZGqa+4hZQkCKLVuDSw== X-Received: by 2002:a67:3144:: with SMTP id x65mr26675497vsx.186.1546910975875; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:29:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vs1-f41.google.com (mail-vs1-f41.google.com. [209.85.217.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k200sm22978566vke.9.2019.01.07.17.29.34 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:29:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-f41.google.com with SMTP id h78so1496552vsi.6 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:29:34 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a67:2c13:: with SMTP id s19mr24442833vss.172.1546910974212; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:29:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50db058a-7dde-441b-a7f9-f6837fe8b69f@schaufler-ca.com> In-Reply-To: From: Kees Cook Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:29:21 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/38] LSM: Module stacking for SARA and Landlock To: James Morris Cc: Casey Schaufler , linux-security-module , LKML , SE Linux , John Johansen , Tetsuo Handa , Paul Moore , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Smalley , Alexey Dobriyan , =?UTF-8?B?TWlja2HDq2wgU2FsYcO8bg==?= , Salvatore Mesoraca Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:19 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:57 AM James Morris wrote: > > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:22 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > > v5: Include Kees Cook's rework of the lsm command > > > > line interface. Stacking is not conditional. > > > > > > Can you resend this series with corrected "From:" lines in the body, etc? > > > > > > Beyond that, I obviously like it. James, what's needed for this to move forward? > > > > If there are no outstanding issues, I plan to merge this for 4.21. > > Yeah, it looks good to me. (Excepting getting the authorship sorted.) I didn't see this actually get merged? Was there something that needed fixing? Should I send you a direct pull request for v5.1? -- Kees Cook