From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: jeffxu@chromium.org
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
jorgelo@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org,
Luis Hector Chavez <lhchavez@google.com>,
Luis Hector Chavez <lhchavez@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_PERMISSIVE_DONTAUDIT
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:11:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhS-jv5cpSdq7dxFGYH=z=5grQceNMyjroeL2KHdrVUV6g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921185426.1663357-2-jeffxu@chromium.org>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:54 PM <jeffxu@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
>
> When SECURITY_SELINUX_DEVELOP=y and the system is running in permissive
> mode, it is useful to disable logging from permissive domain, so audit
> log does not get spamed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Hector Chavez <lhchavez@google.com>
> Tested-by: Luis Hector Chavez <lhchavez@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Jeff Xu<jeffxu@chromium.org>
> ---
> security/selinux/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> security/selinux/avc.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
I'm sorry, but I can't accept this into the upstream kernel.
Permissive mode, both per-domain and system-wide, is not intended to
be a long term solution. Permissive mode should really only be used
as a development tool or emergency "hotfix" with the proper solution
being either an adjustment of the existing policy (SELinux policy
booleans, labeling changes, etc.) or the development of a new policy
module which better fits your use case.
--
paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 18:54 [PATCH 0/1] Add CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_PERMISSIVE_DONTAUDIT jeffxu
2022-09-21 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] " jeffxu
2022-09-21 19:11 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2022-09-23 17:43 ` Jeff Xu
2022-09-23 18:04 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-23 18:45 ` Dominick Grift
2022-09-26 18:03 ` Jeff Xu
2022-09-26 21:40 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-28 16:49 ` Jeff Xu
2023-02-13 5:44 ` Jeff Xu
2023-02-13 7:39 ` Dominick Grift
2023-02-17 15:22 ` Stephen Smalley
2023-02-17 15:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2023-03-10 0:32 ` Jeff Xu
2022-09-21 19:10 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHC9VhS-jv5cpSdq7dxFGYH=z=5grQceNMyjroeL2KHdrVUV6g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=jorgelo@chromium.org \
--cc=lhchavez@chromium.org \
--cc=lhchavez@google.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).