From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA3EC432C1 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E8620882 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:45:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569285910; bh=jUOVPpZS0x/8ppptq3CkH489ohfvKfn6jyaaqEc/zBE=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=x6u5U5uaxKtxlyjn3WKZtHvd5M68g71tkFK5mLl4Tjo/yUMcTu//2yCDY0o3xGmiV wVcgwlAD+W8JU0d7brIAsCryJTyNL+HSWq5Xg7A14DQyIHw++K4wxBrIHp8xKZvDlj /IWuWPE0w/53q6bFnJoKBK18wcLNd1AMig7ZAfnk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391055AbfIXApJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:45:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:33182 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391527AbfIXApJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:45:09 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id a22so73499ljd.0 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/64PPB5d/u2+0Z5QEyaFUQb1FXYalWwnZUF4/RRNz2Y=; b=Jek3G9kVUtkQOqQMOKqOrV9gVq5lSipvNe1iluOEV7QCIIEX8CSTzqF5gfy5LKWl2J kqpKIiiZkZaEJHYhdRCKUm9aQzXs6yqjFUmlSpKajn5B07EYRrME+BaMwsXVcHP0tQlt o5pN+77AupV1rOKlfhXo2xpkgOn6wGfpwSHPk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/64PPB5d/u2+0Z5QEyaFUQb1FXYalWwnZUF4/RRNz2Y=; b=XEWxGYVhUcaPx4L5UuYmzTA7qNTvCA7QFIw+gsmO9DQlS9PZAPbq0q6XdBmQ7K+ITu hyzcD820ONB9bjLWSvwTxivLuVDfCy3e3yPQHEtuGTZ9/cha/Mo35O1DHILwpemmyvAU rW2yum+g2scrG46zjsnqLMqHOF1HVsd8SKsr7f1/H8KLKv+iq479YZC8vkcZFwEK0Btc VEcLI3C0t1NeHE6b8jWb0XfYV/Utez7D1VlWtAizb3mC7TE1kvliI7n5rRm/VtB5X30F a8pkZ7tqZQlTWi73+264Dr6AiNbjvJn/R8kldm9Paw0wVe7C7/HD3yAeIVbLseQcv9cZ vduQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXFcXb21yCStYAnZqYZP2PDb1cBtMz2MWVYG02rGpSgQc7ChdU kIRm1ORAMH/eUhKUbHSXZdJJpQQQuOA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjTQq2tnvlDI50Y0gZfKQdIyJzj0B0VTkenTbU6SabJs+OfR4Qu0gFyMb8Q9BXD9fmMBaC9g== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d4a:: with SMTP id y10mr14559ljj.181.1569285906931; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com. [209.85.208.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm52394lfa.67.2019.09.23.17.45.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id e17so33533ljf.13 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9854:: with SMTP id e20mr37660ljj.72.1569285905710; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190923233038.GE7828@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> In-Reply-To: <20190923233038.GE7828@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:44:49 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID LSM changes for 5.4 To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Micah Morton , Jann Horn , Bart Van Assche , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-security-module Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:30 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > I pushed some (untested) commits out to the dev branch of -rcu, the > overall effect of which is shown in the patch below. The series > adds a new rcu_replace() to avoid confusion with swap(), replaces > uses of rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace(), and finally removes > rcu_swap_protected(). > > Is this what you had in mind? > > Unless you tell me otherwise, I will assume that this change is important > but not violently urgent. (As in not for the current merge window.) Ack, looks good to me, Linus