From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D11C433FE for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440F26108E for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235609AbhICPv7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:51:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:55126 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235824AbhICPv6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:51:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630684256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MoQLQTqUY5yDM/Q0pchQHfi3iihhP0hcaHsviw39pb8=; b=bIzPqff02uJU3F917ZBPWIXiba4iwjlsCmg++d8QAWeg62buxo3KqJC7QZmM2fH5m4/iXH nUlID5rNBL4V/3NATYn2MIAAaNK7LUOjKsLredufjDzjnMC4QFCVFgak9sMkFA6Y8BB8w2 BX+PhEPf0HJCLWwLgPccmVPkuOLrP50= Received: from mail-io1-f70.google.com (mail-io1-f70.google.com [209.85.166.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-442-FUOd6sjaMqKeiHyNtW4cCA-1; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 11:50:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: FUOd6sjaMqKeiHyNtW4cCA-1 Received: by mail-io1-f70.google.com with SMTP id i78-20020a6b3b51000000b005b8dd0f9e76so4160090ioa.9 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:50:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MoQLQTqUY5yDM/Q0pchQHfi3iihhP0hcaHsviw39pb8=; b=IpwevbKCfhLehyH+aZ9u+Zym1QOcoOpA1dlEGAyiqjo4GZiO3H8DQqz/sgL0WRdIoM oLo84oR72Ty9e7k5a4xbdfnQFxCCWyEv/49uKw8lOfi118rMBCmUpktvqV6uKYlh1y5Q exS4EzgrLFiThkiVP/4ufc/5ouFF2bY0Qnt3o5N4vJsMdcPWCiaiwSq+nfHZrz0TG4jW COjUcq6uYF1OdIFY17Ap1nVtgWEYqjsQFj0sHw4ZJHsSSH8iFlUzpiFPRvYL+I57rU/z AsznG7uU+jiLpbxGmjqQe/Dl5Qy7iZszHo9IfDZUncE9oFXYRkBdmo8wgArhlRQkiElh rnVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+vomoCUV9KHz22BMn87sz4uYMQPSwCoF6+ja/oeVQY0/kesYJ 1FL6VpCiEs3jqHplR4JJ8Dg/OXDaduUwQHovAY3XBYJEJBEYdGK7VYelemfe/r8fev0POjLKlkh ZX8m/4vv7eadWgPJ3j6W6EEGnVy2WSiCijCe6htwkqqQEzFPvMsJI X-Received: by 2002:a92:1944:: with SMTP id e4mr3012470ilm.186.1630684254587; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxA5hXocfG238Br3Kxfn76guZ5oIlMhSVgOX7QM7jB7Qbl9LikvJuc4o8e5u68QJjhURVNmZgDTJj9VHCBUSvY= X-Received: by 2002:a92:1944:: with SMTP id e4mr3012456ilm.186.1630684254354; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210902152228.665959-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Bruce Fields Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:50:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/1] xfstests: generic/062: Do not run on newer kernels To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , fstests , linux-fsdevel , LKML , virtio-fs@redhat.com, Daniel Walsh , David Gilbert , Christian Brauner , Casey Schaufler , LSM , selinux@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , Miklos Szeredi , Giuseppe Scrivano , stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, Dave Chinner , Alexander Viro Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=bfields@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:43 AM Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:42:34AM -0400, Bruce Fields wrote: > > Well, we could also look at supporting trusted.* xattrs over NFS. I > > don't know much about them, but it looks like it wouldn't be a lot of > > work to specify, especially now that we've already got user xattrs? > > We'd just write a new internet draft that refers to the existing > > user.* xattr draft for most of the details. > > Will be nice if we can support trusted.* xattrs on NFS. Maybe I should start a separate thread for that. Who would need to be on it to be sure we get this right? --b.