From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F831C3A5A7 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CC3233A1 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730166AbfICRGJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:06:09 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:32888 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1730149AbfICRGI (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:06:08 -0400 Received: (qmail 4903 invoked by uid 2102); 3 Sep 2019 13:06:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Sep 2019 13:06:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:06:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: David Howells cc: Guenter Roeck , , Casey Schaufler , Stephen Smalley , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , , Christian Brauner , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] usb: Add USB subsystem notifications [ver #7] In-Reply-To: <29419.1567528161@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, David Howells wrote: > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > This added call to usbdev_remove() results in a crash when running > > > > the qemu "tosa" emulation. Removing the call fixes the problem. > > > > > > Yeah - I'm going to drop the bus notification messages for now. > > > > > It is not the bus notification itself causing problems. It is the > > call to usbdev_remove(). > > Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix it and don't have much time to > investigate it right now - and it's something that can be added back later. The cause of your problem is quite simple: static int usbdev_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *dev) { switch (action) { case USB_DEVICE_ADD: + post_usb_device_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_DEVICE_ADD, 0); break; case USB_DEVICE_REMOVE: + post_usb_device_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_DEVICE_REMOVE, 0); + usbdev_remove(dev); + break; + case USB_BUS_ADD: + post_usb_bus_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_BUS_ADD, 0); + break; + case USB_BUS_REMOVE: + post_usb_bus_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_BUS_REMOVE, 0); usbdev_remove(dev); break; } The original code had usbdev_remove(dev) under the USB_DEVICE_REMOVE case. The patch mistakenly moves it, putting it under the USB_BUS_REMOVE case. If the usbdev_remove() call were left where it was originally, the problem would be solved. Alan Stern