linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Some LSM and SGX remarks before parting of for two weeks
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:12:23 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1907121303080.17953@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712021055.22qijpsahsy3gpmp@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

> Before going to a two week vacation (sending v21 today), I'll make some
> remarks on SGX and LSM's:
> 
> 1. Currently all patch sets proposing LSM changes are missing a problem
>    statement and describe a solution to an undescribed problem.
> 2. When speaking of SELinux I haven't seen any draft's on how would
>    define a policy module with the new constructs. Does not have to
>    be a full policy modules but more like snippets demosntrating that
>    "this would work".
> 3. All the SELinux discussion is centered on type based policies.
>    Potentially one could isolate enclaves with some UBAC or RBAC
>    based model. That could be good first step and might not even
>    require LSM changes.

Unless I misunderstand what you mean here, RBAC and UBAC in SELinux still 
require LSM hooks, and are typically integrated with Type Enforcement.



-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-12  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-12  2:10 Some LSM and SGX remarks before parting of for two weeks Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-12  3:12 ` James Morris [this message]
2019-07-12  5:14   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1907121303080.17953@namei.org \
    --to=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).