From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
"linux-audit@redhat.com" <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
Linux Security Module list
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Preferred subj= with multiple LSMs
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:36:46 +1000 (AEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1907171435200.2314@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhS-WGuKYzG5AU01BN8tk8nzp+7qxk7Sz-hbHQGL+UXOfg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Paul Moore wrote:
> The subj_X approach is still backwards compatible, the difference is
> that old versions of the tools get a "?" for the LSM creds which is a
> rather sane way of indicating something is different.
This will still break existing userspace, right? We can't do that.
> Once again, I believe that the subj_X approach is going to be faster
> than safely parsing the multiplexed format.
What about emitting one audit record for each LSM?
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-17 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-12 16:33 Preferred subj= with multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
[not found] ` <c46932ec-e38e-ba15-7ceb-70e0fe0ef5dc@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-07-13 15:08 ` Steve Grubb
2019-07-15 19:04 ` Richard Guy Briggs
[not found] ` <1979804.kRvuSoDnao@x2>
[not found] ` <2802ddee-b621-c2eb-9ff3-ea15c4f19d0c@schaufler-ca.com>
[not found] ` <3577098.oGDFHdoSSQ@x2>
2019-07-16 17:16 ` Casey Schaufler
[not found] ` <CAHC9VhSELVZN8feH56zsANqoHu16mPMD04Ww60W=r6tWs+8WnQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-16 17:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-16 17:43 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-16 17:58 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-16 18:06 ` Steve Grubb
2019-07-16 18:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-16 21:25 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-16 21:46 ` Steve Grubb
2019-07-16 22:18 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-16 23:13 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-16 23:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-17 12:14 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-17 15:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-17 16:23 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-17 23:02 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-18 13:10 ` Simon McVittie
2019-07-18 16:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-19 12:15 ` Simon McVittie
2019-07-19 16:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-19 18:47 ` Simon McVittie
2019-07-19 20:02 ` Dbus and multiple LSMs (was Preferred subj= with multiple LSMs) Casey Schaufler
2019-07-22 11:36 ` Simon McVittie
2019-07-22 16:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-19 21:21 ` Preferred subj= with multiple LSMs Paul Moore
2019-07-22 20:50 ` James Morris
2019-07-22 22:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-22 22:30 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-23 0:11 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-23 14:06 ` Simon McVittie
2019-07-23 17:32 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-07-23 21:46 ` James Morris
2019-07-16 23:09 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-17 4:36 ` James Morris [this message]
2019-07-17 12:23 ` Paul Moore
2019-07-18 15:01 ` William Roberts
2019-07-18 18:48 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1907171435200.2314@namei.org \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).