linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Only print errors about failing to get certs if EFI vars are found
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:38:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c021654a-8d34-b34b-098b-b7622e7b0b39@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71e319d0-5fa9-f464-8546-b51629ae4ab3@redhat.com>

Hello Hans,

Thanks a lot for your feedback.

On 11/19/19 11:59 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 19-11-2019 10:18, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> If CONFIG_LOAD_UEFI_KEYS is enabled, the kernel attempts to load the certs
>> from the db, dbx and MokListRT EFI variables into the appropriate keyrings.
>>
>> But it just assumes that the variables will be present and prints an error
>> if the certs can't be loaded, even when is possible that the variables may
>> not exist. For example the MokListRT variable will only be present if shim
>> is used.
>>
>> So only print an error message about failing to get the certs list from an
>> EFI variable if this is found. Otherwise these printed errors just pollute
>> the kernel ring buffer with confusing messages like the following:
>>
>> [    5.427251] Couldn't get size: 0x800000000000000e
>> [    5.427261] MODSIGN: Couldn't get UEFI db list
>> [    5.428012] Couldn't get size: 0x800000000000000e
>> [    5.428023] Couldn't get UEFI MokListRT
>>
>> Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks for this, I just noticed a potential issue which I missed
> when you send this to me for testing:
> 

[snip]

>>   
>>   	if (!efi.get_variable)
>> @@ -153,8 +156,8 @@ static int __init load_uefi_certs(void)
>>   	 * an error if we can't get them.
>>   	 */
>>   	if (!uefi_check_ignore_db()) {
>> -		db = get_cert_list(L"db", &secure_var, &dbsize);
>> -		if (!db) {
>> +		db = get_cert_list(L"db", &secure_var, &dbsize, &status);
>> +		if (!db && status != EFI_NOT_FOUND) {
>>   			pr_err("MODSIGN: Couldn't get UEFI db list\n");
>>   		} else {
>>   			rc = parse_efi_signature_list("UEFI:db",

You are correct, this is another instance of the same issue that you mentioned.

>> @@ -166,8 +169,8 @@ static int __init load_uefi_certs(void)
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	mok = get_cert_list(L"MokListRT", &mok_var, &moksize);
>> -	if (!mok) {
>> +	mok = get_cert_list(L"MokListRT", &mok_var, &moksize, &status);
>> +	if (!mok && status != EFI_NOT_FOUND) {
>>   		pr_info("Couldn't get UEFI MokListRT\n");
>>   	} else {
>>   		rc = parse_efi_signature_list("UEFI:MokListRT",
> 
> This means that if status == EFI_NOT_FOUND we end up still
> trying to parse the signature list, I guess that moksize == 0
> or some such is saving us here, but I believe that
> this should really be:
> 
> 	if (!mok) {
> 		if (status != EFI_NOT_FOUND)
> 			pr_info("Couldn't get UEFI MokListRT\n");
> 	} else {
> 		rc = parse_efi_signature_list("UEFI:MokListRT",
> 

Agreed. I'll fix the issues and post a v2. Since we are adding these statements,
I could also print debug messages for the case that status == EFI_NOT_FOUND.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat


      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-19 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-19  9:18 [PATCH] efi: Only print errors about failing to get certs if EFI vars are found Javier Martinez Canillas
2019-11-19 10:59 ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 11:38   ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c021654a-8d34-b34b-098b-b7622e7b0b39@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).