From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tomoyo: Avoid potential null pointer access
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:25:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfc96d99-adff-6eb9-9685-422587830eb8@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125121043.107662-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Hello, Zheng.
Thank you for a patch, but I won't apply this patch.
Expected behavior is that tomoyo_warn_oom() is called
if tomoyo_memory_ok() is called with entry == NULL.
Adding __GFP_NOWARN might be OK, but returning without tomoyo_warn_oom() is NG.
On 2020/11/25 21:10, Zheng Zengkai wrote:
> Calls to kzalloc() should be null-checked in order to avoid
> any potential failures or unnecessary code execution.
> Fix this by adding null checks for _entry_ right after allocation.
>
> Fixes: 57c2590fb7fd ("TOMOYO: Update profile structure")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Nacked-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
> security/tomoyo/common.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/tomoyo/common.c b/security/tomoyo/common.c
> index 4bee32bfe16d..99b4fafcb100 100644
> --- a/security/tomoyo/common.c
> +++ b/security/tomoyo/common.c
> @@ -499,6 +499,8 @@ static struct tomoyo_profile *tomoyo_assign_profile
> if (ptr)
> return ptr;
> entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_NOFS);
> + if (!entry)
> + return NULL;
> if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&tomoyo_policy_lock))
> goto out;
> ptr = ns->profile_ptr[profile];
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 12:10 [PATCH] tomoyo: Avoid potential null pointer access Zheng Zengkai
2020-11-25 12:25 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2020-11-26 6:33 ` Zheng Zengkai
2020-11-26 6:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-11-27 7:17 ` Zheng Zengkai
2020-11-27 10:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cfc96d99-adff-6eb9-9685-422587830eb8@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zhengzengkai@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).