From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F57C6783B for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232E820849 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:02:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 232E820849 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=i-love.sakura.ne.jp Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726312AbeLKVCf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:02:35 -0500 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:48697 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726134AbeLKVCf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:02:35 -0500 Received: from fsav305.sakura.ne.jp (fsav305.sakura.ne.jp [153.120.85.136]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wBBL2QlK046261; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:02:26 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav305.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav305.sakura.ne.jp); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:02:26 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav305.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (softbank126126163036.bbtec.net [126.126.163.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBBL2J1R046209 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:02:26 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/38] LSM: Module stacking for SARA and Landlock To: James Morris Cc: linux-security-module , Dmitry Vyukov References: <50db058a-7dde-441b-a7f9-f6837fe8b69f@schaufler-ca.com> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:02:18 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: On 2018/12/12 3:57, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:22 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: >>> v5: Include Kees Cook's rework of the lsm command >>> line interface. Stacking is not conditional. >> >> Can you resend this series with corrected "From:" lines in the body, etc? >> >> Beyond that, I obviously like it. James, what's needed for this to move forward? > > If there are no outstanding issues, I plan to merge this for 4.21. > Then, can we send it to linux-next.git shortly so that we can have some time for testing by syzbot?