From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: move lpc32xx and dove to multiplatform Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:53:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20190731225303.GC1330@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190731195713.3150463-1-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190731195713.3150463-1-arnd@arndb.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: soc@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vladimir Zapolskiy , Sylvain Lemieux , Gregory Clement , Linus Walleij , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Guenter Roeck , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:56:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > For dove, the patches are basically what I had proposed back in > 2015 when all other ARMv6/ARMv7 machines became part of a single > kernel build. I don't know what the state is mach-dove support is, > compared to the DT based support in mach-mvebu for the same > hardware. If they are functionally the same, we could also just > remove mach-dove rather than applying my patches. Well, the good news is that I'm down to a small board support file for the Dove Cubox now - but the bad news is, that there's still a board support file necessary to support everything the Dove SoC has to offer. Even for a DT based Dove Cubox, I'm still using mach-dove, but it may be possible to drop most of mach-dove now. Without spending a lot of time digging through it, it's impossible to really know. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up