From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AE8C433E1 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B04420679 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:01:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592222511; bh=CM24pedTnetKRTjlq0H+6fc2bSL16QovoA2odE5GIvY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=JUmSDcXTaFM1Nuoe+lBgH6vR0Gd9F2gPv7SQAwDmc0Y0nt/j39QIy+/6NcPeHieKW 4k8PktE5bxaVed/6P3vDC5UTCpw2hI0zz2K0xbL9oA429yTLYn0oHbTJyaAnDblZuD DZHN91KXCTOJW3BsQgfX30bdre9S1j+1rULm6Mdg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729786AbgFOMBu (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:01:50 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60946 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729734AbgFOMBt (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:01:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 741A320714; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:01:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592222509; bh=CM24pedTnetKRTjlq0H+6fc2bSL16QovoA2odE5GIvY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=f4AIuqKc7TIwjfvhv2rmefsUZLRNT8PWkKDYmZzB2Y2K0R+Bim8k0XxWMyEWFRZyx VDtL/EyqDSXpCpLHMs+CRe9zfpzov4HjNszopTxDyVAgdHctUOXZf5VWZX4Arhs8ry Hbaf2QazFrz0l50kvfyfqiWJc0/uBGadeW4ift+Y= Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:01:46 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Akash Asthana Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, swboyd@chromium.org, mgautam@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, mka@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org, msavaliy@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 RESEND 6/7] spi: spi-qcom-qspi: Add interconnect support Message-ID: <20200615120146.GK4447@sirena.org.uk> References: <1591682194-32388-1-git-send-email-akashast@codeaurora.org> <1591682194-32388-7-git-send-email-akashast@codeaurora.org> <2e299942-2a51-f023-ea6a-fa7822912d9e@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUvfsPTz/SzOZDdw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e299942-2a51-f023-ea6a-fa7822912d9e@codeaurora.org> X-Cookie: Offer may end without notice. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org --fUvfsPTz/SzOZDdw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:57:12PM +0530, Akash Asthana wrote: > Hi Mark, >=20 > Would you be able to review/ack this QSPI patch, you have already acked "= QUP > SPI" patch from the series "[Patch V7 RESEND 4/7]" >=20 > Putting a gentle reminder in-case this patch is missed. Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --fUvfsPTz/SzOZDdw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl7nYyoACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DyOAf/buJgSYiAf2Fl+YYl1CDe6yV/KLmnww9YUYvfvzsGAJLXJZVQthCKq7zr j7m+iDZpujyNeT1zSI1hZqy7sXVaPc3zdMOP+LFa0xVHxICQh4oF0qsHbn402vI+ S7xT0XB1vK526+pHgLJ9FS18jP7z3T2C97M/1E5IvIjpvv4HipVwAsXUuroPZy04 2ePbyIT5rye/tCgBmh8QoZbrtOEM+NBz5zkphREYpUA0Yhb7bWjtbswguwBR+IpQ OW5+r2OlQ7FHxKWSChKMXAuD3zIdagwe6tkXKFr0ZqzZJpzClcNyU9GMA3PDfIYx cMoFw4AZrl5MTycVwk4DnifcFo+giQ== =sGlf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUvfsPTz/SzOZDdw--