linux-sgx.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com,
	jarkko@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX1 and SGX2 sub-features
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:43:06 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0adc41774945bf9d6e6a72a93b83c80aa8c59544.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210301113257.GD6699@zn.tnic>

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 12:32 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:28:27AM +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
> > I think some script can utilize /proc/cpuinfo. For instance, admin can have
> > automation tool/script to deploy enclave (with sgx2) apps, and that script can check
> > whether platform supports sgx2 or not, before it can deploy those enclave apps. Or
> > enclave author may just want to check /proc/cpuinfo to know whether the machine can
> > be used for testing sgx2 enclave or not.
> 
> This doesn't sound like a concrete use of this. So you can hide it
> initially with "" until you guys have a use case. Exposing it later is
> always easy vs exposing it now and then not being able to change it
> anymore.
> 

Hi Haitao, Jarkko,

Do you have more concrete use case of needing "sgx2" in /proc/cpuinfo?

Hi Boris,

To confirm, if we suppress both "sgx1" and "sgx2" in /proc/cpuinfo, we don't need to
add "why to suppress" in commit message, right?



  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-01  9:44 [PATCH 00/25] KVM SGX virtualization support Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86/cpufeatures: Make SGX_LC feature bit depend on SGX bit Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX1 and SGX2 sub-features Kai Huang
2021-03-01 10:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-01 10:19     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01 10:30       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-01 10:40         ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01 10:53           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-01 11:28             ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01 11:32               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-01 11:43                 ` Kai Huang [this message]
2021-03-01 11:58                   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-01 12:08                     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-02 15:48                   ` Haitao Huang
2021-03-02 15:58                     ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-07 22:49                       ` Kai Huang
2021-03-10 15:30                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-02 16:02                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02 17:53                     ` Boris Petkov
2021-03-02 18:27                       ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from sgx_free_epc_page() Kai Huang
2021-03-01 17:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02  0:32     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86/sgx: Add SGX_CHILD_PRESENT hardware error code Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests Kai Huang
2021-03-01 16:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02  0:33     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86/cpu/intel: Allow SGX virtualization without Launch Control support Kai Huang
2021-03-05 17:29   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-07 23:50     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-08  0:19       ` Kai Huang
2021-03-10 15:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86/sgx: Initialize virtual EPC driver even when SGX driver is disabled Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86/sgx: Expose SGX architectural definitions to the kernel Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86/sgx: Move ENCLS leaf definitions to sgx.h Kai Huang
2021-03-01 16:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02  0:34     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86/sgx: Add SGX2 ENCLS leaf definitions (EAUG, EMODPR and EMODT) Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86/sgx: Add encls_faulted() helper Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86/sgx: Add helper to update SGX_LEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs Kai Huang
2021-03-01 16:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02  0:34     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86/sgx: Add helpers to expose ECREATE and EINIT to KVM Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86/sgx: Move provisioning device creation out of SGX driver Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 15/25] KVM: x86: Export kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_{read,write}() for SGX (VMX) Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 16/25] KVM: x86: Define new #PF SGX error code bit Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 17/25] KVM: x86: Add support for reverse CPUID lookup of scattered features Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 18/25] KVM: x86: Add reverse-CPUID lookup support for scattered SGX features Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 19/25] KVM: VMX: Add basic handling of VM-Exit from SGX enclave Kai Huang
2021-03-01 16:52   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02  0:50     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 20/25] KVM: VMX: Frame in ENCLS handler for SGX virtualization Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 21/25] KVM: VMX: Add SGX ENCLS[ECREATE] handler to enforce CPUID restrictions Kai Huang
2021-03-01 17:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-02  0:54     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-02  5:34     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-02  8:44     ` Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 22/25] KVM: VMX: Add emulation of SGX Launch Control LE hash MSRs Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 23/25] KVM: VMX: Add ENCLS[EINIT] handler to support SGX Launch Control (LC) Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 24/25] KVM: VMX: Enable SGX virtualization for SGX1, SGX2 and LC Kai Huang
2021-03-01  9:46 ` [PATCH 25/25] KVM: x86: Add capability to grant VM access to privileged SGX attribute Kai Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0adc41774945bf9d6e6a72a93b83c80aa8c59544.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).