Linux-Sgx Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>,
	Chunyang Hui <sanqian.hcy@antfin.com>,
	Jordan Hand <jorhand@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>,
	Seth Moore <sethmo@google.com>,
	Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	asapek@google.com, bp@alien8.de, cedric.xing@intel.com,
	chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com,
	cyhanish@google.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
	kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com,
	luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com,
	rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com,
	mikko.ylinen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v39 13/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGES
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:25:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1739984e-0010-2031-1561-809a0b6380bb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201003045059.665934-14-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>


> +/**
> + * struct sgx_enclave_add_pages - parameter structure for the
> + *                                %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGE ioctl
> + * @src:	start address for the page data
> + * @offset:	starting page offset

Is this the offset *within* the page?  Might be nice to say that.

> + * @length:	length of the data (multiple of the page size)
> + * @secinfo:	address for the SECINFO data
> + * @flags:	page control flags
> + * @count:	number of bytes added (multiple of the page size)
> + */
> +struct sgx_enclave_add_pages {
> +	__u64 src;
> +	__u64 offset;
> +	__u64 length;
> +	__u64 secinfo;
> +	__u64 flags;
> +	__u64 count;
> +};
> +
>  #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_SGX_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> index 9bb4694e57c1..e13e04737683 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,302 @@ static long sgx_ioc_enclave_create(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static struct sgx_encl_page *sgx_encl_page_alloc(struct sgx_encl *encl,
> +						 unsigned long offset,
> +						 u64 secinfo_flags)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page;
> +	unsigned long prot;
> +
> +	encl_page = kzalloc(sizeof(*encl_page), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!encl_page)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	encl_page->desc = encl->base + offset;
> +	encl_page->encl = encl;

Somewhere, we need an explanation of why we have 'sgx_epc_page' and
'sgx_encl_page'.  I think they're 1:1 at least after
sgx_encl_page_alloc(), so I'm wondering why we need two.

> +	prot = _calc_vm_trans(secinfo_flags, SGX_SECINFO_R, PROT_READ)  |
> +	       _calc_vm_trans(secinfo_flags, SGX_SECINFO_W, PROT_WRITE) |
> +	       _calc_vm_trans(secinfo_flags, SGX_SECINFO_X, PROT_EXEC);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * TCS pages must always RW set for CPU access while the SECINFO
> +	 * permissions are *always* zero - the CPU ignores the user provided
> +	 * values and silently overwrites them with zero permissions.
> +	 */
> +	if ((secinfo_flags & SGX_SECINFO_PAGE_TYPE_MASK) == SGX_SECINFO_TCS)
> +		prot |= PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
> +
> +	/* Calculate maximum of the VM flags for the page. */
> +	encl_page->vm_max_prot_bits = calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, 0);
> +
> +	return encl_page;
> +}
> +
> +static int sgx_validate_secinfo(struct sgx_secinfo *secinfo)
> +{
> +	u64 perm = secinfo->flags & SGX_SECINFO_PERMISSION_MASK;
> +	u64 pt = secinfo->flags & SGX_SECINFO_PAGE_TYPE_MASK;

I'd align the ='s up there ^^

> +
> +	if (pt != SGX_SECINFO_REG && pt != SGX_SECINFO_TCS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if ((perm & SGX_SECINFO_W) && !(perm & SGX_SECINFO_R))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * CPU will silently overwrite the permissions as zero, which means
> +	 * that we need to validate it ourselves.
> +	 */
> +	if (pt == SGX_SECINFO_TCS && perm)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (secinfo->flags & SGX_SECINFO_RESERVED_MASK)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (memchr_inv(secinfo->reserved, 0, sizeof(secinfo->reserved)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __sgx_encl_add_page(struct sgx_encl *encl,
> +			       struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page,
> +			       struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page,
> +			       struct sgx_secinfo *secinfo, unsigned long src)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_pageinfo pginfo;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	struct page *src_page;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Deny noexec. */
> +	vma = find_vma(current->mm, src);
> +	if (!vma)
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYEXEC))
> +		return -EACCES;
> +
> +	ret = get_user_pages(src, 1, 0, &src_page, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 1)
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	pginfo.secs = (unsigned long)sgx_get_epc_addr(encl->secs.epc_page);
> +	pginfo.addr = SGX_ENCL_PAGE_ADDR(encl_page);
> +	pginfo.metadata = (unsigned long)secinfo;
> +	pginfo.contents = (unsigned long)kmap_atomic(src_page);
> +
> +	ret = __eadd(&pginfo, sgx_get_epc_addr(epc_page));

Could you convince me that EADD is not going to fault and make the
kmap_atomic() mad?

> +	kunmap_atomic((void *)pginfo.contents);

All the casting is kinda nasty, but I gues you do it to ensure you can
use __u64 in the hardware structs.

> +	put_page(src_page);
> +
> +	return ret ? -EIO : 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If the caller requires measurement of the page as a proof for the content,
> + * use EEXTEND to add a measurement for 256 bytes of the page. Repeat this
> + * operation until the entire page is measured."
> + */
> +static int __sgx_encl_extend(struct sgx_encl *encl,
> +			     struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {

No magic numbers please.

#define SGX_EEXTEND_NR_BYTES 16 ??

> +		ret = __eextend(sgx_get_epc_addr(encl->secs.epc_page),
> +				sgx_get_epc_addr(epc_page) + (i * 0x100));

What's the 0x100 for?

> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (encls_failed(ret))
> +				ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EEXTEND");
> +			return -EIO;

How frequent should we expect these to be?  Can users cause them?  You
should *proably* call it ENCLS_WARN_ONCE() if it's implemented that way.

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sgx_encl_add_page(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long src,
> +			     unsigned long offset, struct sgx_secinfo *secinfo,
> +			     unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page;
> +	struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	encl_page = sgx_encl_page_alloc(encl, offset, secinfo->flags);
> +	if (IS_ERR(encl_page))
> +		return PTR_ERR(encl_page);
> +
> +	epc_page = __sgx_alloc_epc_page();
> +	if (IS_ERR(epc_page)) {
> +		kfree(encl_page);
> +		return PTR_ERR(epc_page);
> +	}

Looking at these, I'm forgetting why we need to both allocate an
encl_page and an epc_page.  Commends might remind me.  So would better
names.

> +	mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
> +	mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Insert prior to EADD in case of OOM.

I wouldn't say OOM.  Maybe:

	xa_insert() and EADD can both fail.  But xa_insert() is easier
	to unwind so do it first.

>                                              EADD modifies MRENCLAVE, i.e.

What is MRENCLAVE?

> +	 * can't be gracefully unwound, while failure on EADD/EXTEND is limited
> +	 * to userspace errors (or kernel/hardware bugs).
> +	 */
> +	ret = xa_insert(&encl->page_array, PFN_DOWN(encl_page->desc),
> +			encl_page, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_out_unlock;
> +
> +	ret = __sgx_encl_add_page(encl, encl_page, epc_page, secinfo,
> +				  src);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_out;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Complete the "add" before doing the "extend" so that the "add"
> +	 * isn't in a half-baked state in the extremely unlikely scenario
> +	 * the enclave will be destroyed in response to EEXTEND failure.
> +	 */
> +	encl_page->encl = encl;
> +	encl_page->epc_page = epc_page;
> +	encl->secs_child_cnt++;
> +
> +	if (flags & SGX_PAGE_MEASURE) {
> +		ret = __sgx_encl_extend(encl, epc_page);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_out;
> +	}

Why would we never *not* measure an added page?

> +	mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
> +	mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> +	return ret;
> +
> +err_out:
> +	xa_erase(&encl->page_array, PFN_DOWN(encl_page->desc));
> +
> +err_out_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
> +	mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> +
> +	sgx_free_epc_page(epc_page);
> +	kfree(encl_page);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_add_pages() - The handler for %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGES
> + * @encl:       an enclave pointer
> + * @arg:	a user pointer to a struct sgx_enclave_add_pages instance
> + *
> + * Add one or more pages to an uninitialized enclave, and optionally extend the
> + * measurement with the contents of the page. The SECINFO and measurement mask
> + * are applied to all pages.
> + *
> + * A SECINFO for a TCS is required to always contain zero permissions because
> + * CPU silently zeros them. Allowing anything else would cause a mismatch in
> + * the measurement.
> + *
> + * mmap()'s protection bits are capped by the page permissions. For each page
> + * address, the maximum protection bits are computed with the following
> + * heuristics:
> + *
> + * 1. A regular page: PROT_R, PROT_W and PROT_X match the SECINFO permissions.
> + * 2. A TCS page: PROT_R | PROT_W.
> + *
> + * mmap() is not allowed to surpass the minimum of the maximum protection bits
> + * within the given address range.
> + *
> + * The function deinitializes kernel data structures for enclave and returns
> + * -EIO in any of the following conditions:
> + *
> + * - Enclave Page Cache (EPC), the physical memory holding enclaves, has
> + *   been invalidated. This will cause EADD and EEXTEND to fail.
> + * - If the source address is corrupted somehow when executing EADD.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + *   length of the data processed on success,
> + *   -EACCES if an executable source page is located in a noexec partition,
> + *   -ENOMEM if the system is out of EPC pages,
> + *   -EINTR if the call was interrupted before any data was processed,
> + *   -EIO if the enclave was lost
> + *   -errno otherwise
> + */
> +static long sgx_ioc_enclave_add_pages(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_enclave_add_pages addp;
> +	struct sgx_secinfo secinfo;
> +	unsigned long c;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if ((atomic_read(&encl->flags) & SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED) ||
> +	    !(atomic_read(&encl->flags) & SGX_ENCL_CREATED))
> +		return -EINVAL;

There should to be a nice state machine documented somewhere.  Is ther?

> +	if (copy_from_user(&addp, arg, sizeof(addp)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(addp.offset, PAGE_SIZE) ||
> +	    !IS_ALIGNED(addp.src, PAGE_SIZE))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!(access_ok(addp.src, PAGE_SIZE)))
> +		return -EFAULT;

This worries me.  You're doing an access_ok() check on addp.src because
you evidently don't trust it.  But, below, it looks to be accessed
directly with an offset, bound by addp.length, which I think can be
>PAGE_SIZE.

I'd feel a lot better if addp.src's value was being passed around as a
__user pointer.

> +	if (addp.length & (PAGE_SIZE - 1))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (addp.offset + addp.length - PAGE_SIZE >= encl->size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&secinfo, (void __user *)addp.secinfo,
> +			   sizeof(secinfo)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (sgx_validate_secinfo(&secinfo))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (c = 0 ; c < addp.length; c += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			if (!c)
> +				ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> +
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (c == SGX_MAX_ADD_PAGES_LENGTH)
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (need_resched())
> +			cond_resched();
> +
> +		ret = sgx_encl_add_page(encl, addp.src + c, addp.offset + c,
> +					&secinfo, addp.flags);

Yeah...  Don't we need to do another access_ok() check here, if we
needed one above since we are moving away from addrp.src?

> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	addp.count = c;
> +
> +	if (copy_to_user(arg, &addp, sizeof(addp)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the enlave was lost, deinitialize the internal data structures
> +	 * for the enclave.
> +	 */
> +	if (ret == -EIO) {
> +		mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
> +		sgx_encl_destroy(encl);
> +		mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  long sgx_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
>  	struct sgx_encl *encl = filep->private_data;
> @@ -212,6 +508,9 @@ long sgx_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  	case SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE:
>  		ret = sgx_ioc_enclave_create(encl, (void __user *)arg);
>  		break;
> +	case SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGES:
> +		ret = sgx_ioc_enclave_add_pages(encl, (void __user *)arg);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>  		break;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> index fce756c3434b..8d126070db1e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct sgx_epc_section {
>  
>  #define SGX_EPC_SECTION_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
>  #define SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS		(SGX_EPC_SECTION_MASK + 1)
> +#define SGX_MAX_ADD_PAGES_LENGTH	0x100000
>  
>  extern struct sgx_epc_section sgx_epc_sections[SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS];
>  
> 


  reply index

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-03  4:50 [PATCH v39 00/24] Intel SGX foundations Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 01/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX hardware bits Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 14:10   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-19 17:49     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 02/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch Control " Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 03/24] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV with PF_SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 04/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX microarchitectural data structures Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 05/24] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 14:30   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-19 17:38     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-19 17:48       ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-19 17:53         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-19 17:58           ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 06/24] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX support Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 07/24] x86/cpu/intel: Add nosgx kernel parameter Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 08/24] x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) sections Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19  8:45   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 12:39     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-10-23  9:01       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 13:40     ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-23  9:03       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 09/24] x86/sgx: Add __sgx_alloc_epc_page() and sgx_free_epc_page() Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 10/24] mm: Add 'mprotect' hook to struct vm_operations_struct Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 11/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX enclave driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03 14:39   ` Greg KH
2020-10-04 14:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-04 15:01       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05  9:42       ` Greg KH
2020-10-05 12:42         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07 18:09           ` Haitao Huang
2020-10-07 19:26             ` Greg KH
2020-10-09  6:44               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-14 20:16                 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-05  8:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-05 11:42       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 11:50         ` Greg KH
2020-10-05 14:23           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 15:02             ` Greg KH
2020-10-05 16:40               ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-05 20:02                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-09  7:10     ` Pavel Machek
2020-10-09  7:21       ` Greg KH
2020-10-09  8:21         ` Pavel Machek
2020-10-03 19:54   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-04 21:50     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-04 22:02       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-04 22:27       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-04 23:41         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05  1:30           ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-05  3:06             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 12/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-16 17:07   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-18  4:26     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 20:21       ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-19 20:48         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 13/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGES Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-16 21:25   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2020-10-18  5:03     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19  7:03       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-19 20:48       ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-19 21:15         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-19 21:44           ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-23 10:11             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 14/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_INIT Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 15/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-20 15:48   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-23 10:14     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-20 21:19   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-23 10:17     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-23 14:19       ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-24 11:34         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-24 15:47           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-24 20:23             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-27 10:38               ` Dr. Greg
2020-10-23 14:23       ` Jethro Beekman
2020-10-24 11:40         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 16/24] x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  5:22   ` Haitao Huang
2020-10-03 13:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03 18:23       ` Haitao Huang
2020-10-04 22:39         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07 17:25           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 17/24] x86/sgx: Add ptrace() support for the SGX driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 18/24] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 19/24] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 20/24] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions in vDSO before signaling Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 21/24] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-06  2:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-06  8:30     ` Jethro Beekman
2020-10-06 15:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-06 17:28         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-06 23:21           ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-07  0:22             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07  1:17               ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-07  3:14                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07  4:34                   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-07  7:39                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07  8:04                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07 15:25                       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-07 17:08                         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07 17:13                           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-06 15:49       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-06 15:36     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-06 21:39     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-07  0:23       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-17  1:48   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-17 21:02     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 22/24] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-12 16:50   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 23/24] docs: x86/sgx: Document SGX micro architecture and kernel internals Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v39 24/24] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-16 21:04   ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-18  4:27     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-03 14:32 ` [PATCH v39 00/24] Intel SGX foundations Greg KH
2020-10-03 14:53   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-15 19:06 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-17 20:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1739984e-0010-2031-1561-809a0b6380bb@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=asapek@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=chenalexchen@google.com \
    --cc=conradparker@google.com \
    --cc=cyhanish@google.com \
    --cc=darren.kenny@oracle.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jorhand@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
    --cc=kmoy@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludloff@google.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mikko.ylinen@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=puiterwijk@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sanqian.hcy@antfin.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=sethmo@google.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yaozhangx@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Sgx Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/0 linux-sgx/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-sgx linux-sgx/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx \
		linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-sgx

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-sgx


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git