linux-sgx.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	"Dr . Greg Wettstein" <greg@enjellic.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM, round 3
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:29:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625162945.GB7046@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617222438.2080-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 03:24:26PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:

Since you are gone up until end of next week, I'm going to do some
proactive work and for those patches that I only had some feedback
concerning how the code is written etc. I'll just fix those myself and
squash. You can check when you're back and send me follow ups if you
disagree on something I made.

I'll also try to extract *only* the SRCU part from [1] and squash that
to my tree. The main reason is that I want to do my RFC for enclave
life-cycle handling on the same codebase so that we can compare and
make the best possible decision on that.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11005495/

/Jarkko

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-25 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 22:24 [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM, round 3 Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/12] x86/sgx: Add mm to enclave at mmap() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:32   ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-17 23:42   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-18 14:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-18 16:06       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-19 12:56   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-19 13:00     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-20 20:09       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address Sean Christopherson
2019-06-19 13:24   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-19 14:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-20 22:07       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/12] selftests: x86/sgx: Mark the enclave loader as not needing an exec stack Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/12] x86/sgx: Require userspace to define enclave pages' protection bits Sean Christopherson
2019-06-19 14:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-19 15:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-20 22:17       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-07 19:08         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-08 15:23           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-08 16:19             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-09 16:06               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-10 17:25                 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-15 22:29                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-01 16:38                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-04 22:20                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-05 20:51                         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-05 21:30                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-07 18:51                             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/12] x86/sgx: Enforce noexec filesystem restriction for enclaves Sean Christopherson
2019-06-19 14:46   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/12] mm: Introduce vm_ops->may_mprotect() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_map() hook for Intel SGX Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] security/selinux: Require SGX_EXECMEM to map enclave page WX Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_load() hook for Intel SGX Sean Christopherson
2019-06-19 14:56   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-19 21:13     ` James Morris
2019-06-20  9:28       ` Dr. Greg
2019-06-20 22:22       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-23 17:16       ` Dr. Greg
2019-06-26 20:39         ` James Morris
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/12] security/selinux: Add enclave_load() implementation Sean Christopherson
2019-06-18 14:49   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-19 20:59     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/12] security/apparmor: " Sean Christopherson
2019-06-17 22:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Show line of sight to LSM support SGX2's EAUG Sean Christopherson
2019-06-18 13:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM, round 3 Stephen Smalley
2019-06-18 13:55   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-18 15:13     ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-25 16:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190625162945.GB7046@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=greg@enjellic.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).