linux-sgx.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	Shay Katz-zamir <shay.katz-zamir@intel.com>,
	Serge Ayoun <serge.ayoun@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/17] x86/sgx: Fix pages in the BLOCKED state ending up to the free pool
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:33:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190925183303.GI31852@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925002749.GA29629@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 03:27:49AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:21:20AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > +			goto skip;
> > > >  
> > > > +		ret = sgx_encl_get_backing(encl_page->encl,
> > > > +					   SGX_ENCL_PAGE_INDEX(encl_page),
> > > > +					   &backing[i]);
> > > > +		if (ret)
> > > > +			goto skip;
> > > > +
> > > > +		mutex_lock(&encl_page->encl->lock);
> > > > +		encl_page->desc |= SGX_ENCL_PAGE_RECLAIMED;
> > > > +		mutex_unlock(&encl_page->encl->lock);
> > > > +		continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +skip:
> > > 
> > > Eww.  The call to sgx_encl_get_backing() makes it rather ugly no matter
> > > what, but this seems slightly less ugly:
> > > 
> > > 	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> > > 		epc_page = chunk[i];
> > > 		encl_page = epc_page->owner;
> > > 
> > > 		if (!sgx_can_reclaim(chunk[i]) ||
> > > 		    sgx_encl_get_backing(encl_page->encl,
> > > 					 SGX_ENCL_PAGE_INDEX(encl_page),
> > > 					 &backing[i]) {
> > > 			kref_put(&encl_page->encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);
> > > 
> > > 			spin_lock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
> > > 			list_add_tail(&epc_page->list, &sgx_active_page_list);
> > > 			spin_unlock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
> > > 
> > > 			chunk[i] = NULL;
> > > 			continue;
> > > 		}
> > > 
> > > 		mutex_lock(&encl_page->encl->lock);
> > > 		encl_page->desc |= SGX_ENCL_PAGE_RECLAIMED;
> > > 		mutex_unlock(&encl_page->encl->lock);
> > > 	}
> > > 
> 
> Well that is one big nested mess where as the version I did is legit use
> of gotos: two conditions that can cause to skip the action. And also
> fairly normal use of gotos with same ideas as with out/err etc. labels
> except now it is used inside a loop..

Yeah, it's the "inside a loop" part that's ugly.  I agree the nested code
is also heinous.

What if we add a helper to split out the verbose check?  Maybe as below,
or move the entire guts to a separate helper?

static int sgx_prepare_to_reclaim(struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page,
				  struct sgx_backing *backing)
{
	if (!sgx_can_reclaim(encl_page))
		return -EBUSY;

	return sgx_encl_get_backing(encl_page->encl,
				    SGX_ENCL_PAGE_INDEX(encl_page), backing);
}

void sgx_reclaim_pages(void)
{
	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
	epc_page = chunk[i];
	encl_page = epc_page->owner;

	if (!sgx_prepare_to_reclaim(encl_page, &backing[i])) {
		mutex_lock(&encl_page->encl->lock);
		encl_page->desc |= SGX_ENCL_PAGE_RECLAIMED;
		mutex_unlock(&encl_page->encl->lock);
	else {
		kref_put(&encl_page->encl->refcount, sgx_encl_release);

		spin_lock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
		list_add_tail(&epc_page->list, &sgx_active_page_list);
		spin_unlock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);

		chunk[i] = NULL;
	}
}

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-25 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-16 10:17 [PATCH v3 00/17] Fixes and updates for v23 Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] selftest/x86/sgx: Remove encl_piggy.h Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] x86/sgx: Clean up internal includes Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] x86/sgx: Write backing storage only if EWB is successful Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] x86/sgx: Rename 'j' as 'cnt' in sgx_reclaim_pages() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] x86/sgx: Turn encls_failed() as inline function Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] x86/sgx: Move sgx_einit() to encls.c Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] x86/sgx: Remove pages in sgx_reclaimer_write() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] x86/sgx: Calculate page index " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] x86/sgx: Move SGX_ENCL_DEAD check to sgx_reclaimer_write() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-17 23:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-18  4:15     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-17 23:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-18  4:16     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] x86/sgx: Free VA slot when the EWB flow fails Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] x86/sgx: Call sgx_encl_destroy() " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] x86/sgx: Open code sgx_reclaimer_get() and sgx_reclaimer_put() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-17 23:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-18  4:12     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-20 13:38       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] x86/sgx: Introduce sgx_can_reclaim() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-17 23:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-25 18:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-27 15:33     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] x86/sgx: Replace section->free_cnt with a global sgx_nr_free_pages Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-17 22:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-18  4:07     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] x86/sgx: sgx_vma_access(): Do not return -ECANCELED on invalid TCS pages Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] x86/sgx: Introduce sgx_encl_get_backing() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-17 23:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-18  4:10     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] x86/sgx: Fix pages in the BLOCKED state ending up to the free pool Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-17 23:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-18  4:21     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-25  0:27       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-25 18:33         ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-09-27 15:39           ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190925183303.GI31852@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge.ayoun@intel.com \
    --cc=shay.katz-zamir@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).