Linux-Sgx Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>,
	Chunyang Hui <sanqian.hcy@antfin.com>,
	Jordan Hand <jorhand@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>,
	Seth Moore <sethmo@google.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	asapek@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com,
	chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com,
	cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	haitao.huang@intel.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com,
	ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com,
	puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	yaozhangx@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v33 11/21] x86/sgx: Linux Enclave Driver
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 04:43:49 +0300
Message-ID: <20200704014349.GB129411@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200629152718.GA12312@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:27:19AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 01:08:33AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > +static int sgx_encl_init(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_sigstruct *sigstruct,
> > > +			 void *token)
> > > +{
> > > +	u64 mrsigner[4];
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +	int i;
> > > +	int j;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Check that the required attributes have been authorized. */
> > > +	if (encl->secs_attributes & ~encl->allowed_attributes)
> > > +		return -EACCES;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = sgx_get_key_hash(sigstruct->modulus, mrsigner);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (atomic_read(&encl->flags) & SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED) {
> > > +		ret = -EFAULT;
> > > +		goto err_out;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > That test should be the first thing this function or its caller does.
> 
> Hmm, I was going to say that SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED can't be checked until
> encl->lock is held, but that's not true for this path as mutual exclusion
> is provided by the SGX_ENCL_IOCTL flag.  So yeah, this can be checked at
> the same time as SGX_ENCL_CREATED in sgx_ioc_enclave_init().
> 
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < SGX_EINIT_SLEEP_COUNT; i++) {
> > > +		for (j = 0; j < SGX_EINIT_SPIN_COUNT; j++) {
> > 
> > Ew, what's that double-loop for?
> > 
> > It tries to init an enclave a bunch of times. Why does it need to init
> > more than once?
> 
> ENCLS[EINIT] is interruptible because it has such a high latency, e.g. 50k+
> cycles on success.  If an IRQ/NMI/SMI becomes pending, EINIT may fail with
> SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT so that the event can be serviced.
> 
> The idea behind the double loop is to try EINIT in a tight loop, then back
> off and sleep for a while before retrying that tight inner loop.
> 
> > > +			ret = sgx_einit(sigstruct, token, encl->secs.epc_page,
> > > +					mrsigner);
> > > +			if (ret == SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT)
> > > +				continue;
> > > +			else
> > > +				break;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		if (ret != SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT)
> > > +			break;
> > > +
> > > +		msleep_interruptible(SGX_EINIT_SLEEP_TIME);
> > > +
> > > +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> > > +			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> > > +			goto err_out;
> > > +		}
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (ret & ENCLS_FAULT_FLAG) {
> > > +		if (encls_failed(ret))
> > > +			ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EINIT");
> > > +
> > > +		sgx_encl_destroy(encl);
> > > +		ret = -EFAULT;
> > > +	} else if (ret) {
> > > +		pr_debug("EINIT returned %d\n", ret);
> > > +		ret = -EPERM;
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		atomic_or(SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED, &encl->flags);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +err_out:
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * sgx_ioc_enclave_init - handler for %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_INIT
> > > + *
> > > + * @filep:	open file to /dev/sgx
> > 
> > @encl:       pointer to an enclave instance (via ioctl() file pointer)
> > 
> > > + * @arg:	userspace pointer to a struct sgx_enclave_init instance
> > > + *
> > > + * Flush any outstanding enqueued EADD operations and perform EINIT.  The
> > > + * Launch Enclave Public Key Hash MSRs are rewritten as necessary to match
> > > + * the enclave's MRSIGNER, which is caculated from the provided sigstruct.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return:
> > > + *   0 on success,
> > > + *   SGX error code on EINIT failure,
> > > + *   -errno otherwise
> > > + */
> > > +static long sgx_ioc_enclave_init(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct sgx_sigstruct *sigstruct;
> > > +	struct sgx_enclave_init einit;
> > > +	struct page *initp_page;
> > > +	void *token;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!(atomic_read(&encl->flags) & SGX_ENCL_CREATED))
> > 
> > Might just as well check the other flags: doing EINIT on an already
> > initialized enclave - SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED - is perhaps a nono or
> > similarly on a SGX_ENCL_DEAD enclave.
> > 
> > And you could do similar sanity checks in the other ioctl functions.
> 
> Ya, as above, SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED can be checked here.
> 
> SGX_ENCL_DEAD is actually already checked in in the top level sgx_ioctl(),
> i.e. the check in sgx_encl_add_page() can technically be flat out dropped.
> 
> I say "technically" because I'm a bit torn over SGX_ENCL_DEAD; encl->lock
> must be held to SGX_ENCL_DEAD (the page fault and reclaim flows rely on
> this), but as it stands today only ioctl() paths (guarded by SGX_ENCL_IOCTL)
> and sgx_release() (makes the ioctls() unreachable) set SGX_ENCL_DEAD.
> 
> So it's safe to check SGX_ENCL_DEAD from ioctl() context without holding
> encl->lock, at least in the current code base, but it feels weird/sketchy.
> 
> In the end I don't think I have a strong opinion.  Removing the technically
> unnecessary DEAD check in sgx_encl_add_page() is the simplest change, so it
> may make sense to do that and nothing more for initial upstreaming.  Long
> term, I fully expect we'll add paths that set SGX_ENCL_DEAD outside of
> ioctl() context, e.g. to handle EPC OOM, but it wouldn't be a bad thing to
> have a standalone commit in a future series to add DEAD checks (under
> encl->lock) in the ADD and INIT flows.

AFAIK nonne of th ioctl's should not need SGX_ENCL_DEAD check.

/Jarkko

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-17 22:08 [PATCH v33 00/21] Intel SGX foundations Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 01/21] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX hardware bits Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-22 17:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25  1:25     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 02/21] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch Control " Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-24 13:04   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-24 14:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25  1:28       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 03/21] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV with PF_SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25  8:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 15:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25 16:49       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 20:52     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 21:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 13:34         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 04/21] x86/sgx: Add SGX microarchitectural data structures Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 05/21] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 06/21] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX support Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 07/21] x86/cpu/intel: Add nosgx kernel parameter Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 08/21] x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) sections Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 10:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 20:11     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 09/21] x86/sgx: Add __sgx_alloc_epc_page() and sgx_free_epc_page() Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 17:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 20:55     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 10/21] mm: Introduce vm_ops->may_mprotect() Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 17:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 17:30     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-25 18:06       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25 22:40         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 22:26     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 11/21] x86/sgx: Linux Enclave Driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 17:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 18:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25 18:45       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 14:19       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 20:21     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 20:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 13:40         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 18:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 14:17     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-26  9:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 14:16     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-26 14:20       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-07-03 23:04         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03  3:09     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-26 15:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-07-04  0:13     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-27 17:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-29 15:27     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-29 15:37       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-07-04  1:43       ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-07-07  1:38         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-07  3:29           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-04  1:42     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-02  3:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-04  3:31     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-02  3:06       ` Haitao Huang
2020-09-02 16:10         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-02 18:40           ` Haitao Huang
2020-09-04 12:01         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 12/21] x86/sgx: Allow a limited use of ATTRIBUTE.PROVISIONKEY for attestation Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-29 16:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-29 22:04     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-30  8:49       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-30 14:20         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-30 17:13           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-02 20:47         ` Dr. Greg
2020-07-03  2:43         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03  2:38       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03  2:32     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03  2:55       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 13/21] x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 14/21] x86/sgx: ptrace() support for the SGX driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 15/21] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-29 17:10   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-30  6:00     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-30  8:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-30 14:55         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-30 16:48         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-30 17:23           ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-02 12:52           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 16/21] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 17/21] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions in vDSO before signaling Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 18/21] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 19/21] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 20/21] docs: x86/sgx: Document SGX micro architecture and kernel internals Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 21/21] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200704014349.GB129411@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=asapek@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=chenalexchen@google.com \
    --cc=conradparker@google.com \
    --cc=cyhanish@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jorhand@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
    --cc=kmoy@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludloff@google.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=puiterwijk@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sanqian.hcy@antfin.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=sethmo@google.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yaozhangx@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Sgx Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/0 linux-sgx/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-sgx linux-sgx/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx \
		linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-sgx

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-sgx


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git