From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B313EC433E2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9C820663 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="jNMMNjpm" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726724AbgIOOFu (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:05:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:43322 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726709AbgIOOFs (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:05:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600178716; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iWIPRlc8ySpXnZbb3ABJNrp/CQr1HLxNQWDbTLw9BhU=; b=jNMMNjpmtel+UfrVHb7G1mog8yAnGmDB52T3t7oEIa1cDlSgmXTZ7qINbQqAAbSAQCon/4 nFnSC61yIpAJhVXhiZy/kx4wgEdnfG/V+lk0ZKK0FqP+bGcqq9G2iMUWjs1HE5GimZPMYt o2J5YSQXoVKSgqZ1Ha6lbJHB/lP/mHA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-365-C3Xi5FdHMEKiu4tVmFa7xg-1; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:03:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: C3Xi5FdHMEKiu4tVmFa7xg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0629D10BBEE6; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from treble (ovpn-112-136.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.136]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DBFE5DE47; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:02:50 -0500 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , Jethro Beekman , Darren Kenny , akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com, cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v37 02/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch Control hardware bits Message-ID: <20200915140250.kf2kgfbgzxfvmoiy@treble> References: <20200911124019.42178-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200911124019.42178-3-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200914151816.u6camicid4bd5lgo@treble> <20200914153812.c6uh3spqmcy2ft3d@treble> <20200915095716.GI3612@linux.intel.com> <20200915132725.a2qbdio3jsu7rsqs@treble> <20200915133929.GI14436@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200915133929.GI14436@zn.tnic> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Sender: linux-sgx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the > > original thread. > > Probably because he bounced only the ones you didn't get, separately. > > > v38 has some missing patches as well. > > And I got them twice. Can we please stop the spamming? > > And yeah, use another mail service - all those companies switching the > o365 and mimecast, means time to move kernel development off of company > mail because company mail simply can't handle it. If you getting them (twice?) and vger's not, it sounds like vger is dropping them for some reason. -- Josh