From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892ADC4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446792388A for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="cUUuiUuO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728588AbgIXQBB (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:01:01 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:36076 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728381AbgIXQBA (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:01:00 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0c950086c1a307bd73ace8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:9500:86c1:a307:bd73:ace8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 5B47B1EC03D2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:00:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1600963259; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=Rzo2+uteZG8Ttlcty7/jTxT0+oan80JDRiAugBxyH0g=; b=cUUuiUuOw23CcowVMwZSiYfMBNRQ1s5vMhmFk+ugVJnUZJLJj3IMb2UDimKtyDFM6PLX9l gy9KOBz4x3EQM9v8t1+E6QnEMsrlF52eB3oP7lSvx9qD7LdGB8FAu+63oJ2Tp2GOK9RfQ5 /IVW3uFrUKZZvYyDw9f/RAPIgfLxbQg= Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:00:57 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , Andy Lutomirski , Jethro Beekman , akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com, cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 18/24] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Message-ID: <20200924160057.GK5030@zn.tnic> References: <20200915112842.897265-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200915112842.897265-19-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200923220712.GU28545@zn.tnic> <20200924120851.GE56811@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200924120851.GE56811@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 03:09:01PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > This is not technically SGX specific patch. Is SGX documentation the > correct place for this? So what is it then? It is SGX implementation-specific. Why would you not put it in the documentation?! > From checkpatch I only get: Please concentrate and start reading more carefully: ".git/rebase-apply/patch:122: new blank line at EOF." Would that error come from checkpatch? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette