From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04743C41604 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1FB206C3 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725797AbgJCOx1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 10:53:27 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:63951 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725787AbgJCOx1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 10:53:27 -0400 IronPort-SDR: NPUNfHE8P3RjkqfYRPRfIamtGXOxJlOxKAEZDCm6hKKvhQ5dxFS8C/eGUfDjkKziU17+EMpwfA xaPmLVwpTXmw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9763"; a="224833200" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,331,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="224833200" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2020 07:53:25 -0700 IronPort-SDR: Nxgr6J7zaLUrN/rYIYW/Qini8HVbXOdOMbCKb1U9ZXZUMYtfU4pqevBJ4F4NUSLcV/hHRRvs+T j6TsPan8u1hg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,331,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="514593364" Received: from kboulton-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.33.54]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2020 07:53:11 -0700 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:53:07 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Greg KH Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com, bp@alien8.de, cedric.xing@intel.com, chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com, cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com, mikko.ylinen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v39 00/24] Intel SGX foundations Message-ID: <20201003145307.GA7719@linux.intel.com> References: <20201003045059.665934-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20201003143246.GA800720@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20201003143246.GA800720@kroah.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > I might be late to the game, but why are you trying to dual-license the > new files you are adding in this patch? How will that help anyone? > > I have had many talks with Intel about this in the past, and last I > heard was that when dual-licensing made sense, they would be explicit as > to why it was happening. Or is my memory failing me? My true and honest answer is that I cannot recall. Not sure even if it was like when the driver was still out-of-tree implementation. This would back to 2016 :-) But we don't need to dig the exact answr because ➜ linux-tpmdd (next) ✔ git --no-pager grep -e BSD --and \( -e SPDX \) -- "arch/*.[Sc]" arch/arm64/lib/tishift.S:/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) Oh darn, I guess this implies that my hands are tied :-) I'll gladly implement the change. > thanks, > > greg k-h Thank you. /Jarkko