From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C58C433DB for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5345723339 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727906AbhAFX5m (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:57:42 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:1285 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726293AbhAFX5m (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:57:42 -0500 IronPort-SDR: 66bYN2oTbOl0dFAA7UKuBbZUSMyxB0WmFCACXIcPlJTSLrv85pwu7xQ7wsPRgcpIhmvGce0pr5 nrgEmulSVJdQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9856"; a="238899164" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,328,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="238899164" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jan 2021 15:57:01 -0800 IronPort-SDR: g4FDFOZy7psnmwziEKb6eLjtqYPpBG1kXMORxBAZovBQxBvNWdhnfFHEHlaHcj+5vXyrMIV+JS udmQ24gyZbNw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,328,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="422360791" Received: from vastrong-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO khuang2-desk.gar.corp.intel.com) ([10.255.230.243]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jan 2021 15:56:58 -0800 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:56:57 +1300 From: Kai Huang To: Dave Hansen Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX1 and SGX2 sub-features Message-Id: <20210107125657.27ebe6c9cd1e0053ba73f63e@intel.com> In-Reply-To: References: <381b25a0dc0ed3e4579d50efb3634329132a2c02.1609890536.git.kai.huang@intel.com> <6d28e858-a5c0-6ce8-8c0d-2fdfbea3734b@intel.com> <20210107111206.c8207e64540a8361c04259b7@intel.com> <20210107124037.c37b313b016514c361c7f49e@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:43:54 -0800 Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/6/21 3:40 PM, Kai Huang wrote: > > So a better way is to put "Allow SGX virtualization without Launch Control > > Support" at the beginning of this series? If so, the Kconfig > > X86_SGX_VIRTUALIZATION needs to be in separate patch at the very beginning. > > > > Does above make sense? > > I think it's worth trying. No promises that anyone will like the end > result, but give it a shot and I'll take a look. OK I'll try in next version. Thanks.