From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7CDECAAD4 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231845AbiHaSmR (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:42:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40770 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232115AbiHaSmF (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:42:05 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B3A5FA2 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661970293; x=1693506293; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GxihznNswtvhbdVpryhBAdAIUpTuuql68nMdrRswAkA=; b=k1DRvbOenM8/h3SpqnS/Voq/65VOOiiSlRZ9P0Ezc/GqgEwyjBYLTHgp Wv3gljivlpZQjklRXuuK0Hr0TB6xt6kl0fPfT2hEqg+CA/b55OyT3N9eD 78nE0S0Cg62ih66rwdLj8mbKRej5o51z+H+LK0WkrMYM4SuXY7uW7nDrc GrgZ6VpwHAIyHAptVSBlGgkHBr5tnl+mdjatXHgpo8OEA0Ywqy4PBsEKo bKNuxhJqFFVU2YedlGgvvby0Thhzm4dJzofTMKD9eU5E8jkqijKJbFBme 41ee0/SR/0CJucmFi9acrRpm1y688e/T9eNKjXj3cQSY6ib7fuiaKsxBg w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10456"; a="357232810" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,278,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="357232810" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Aug 2022 11:24:52 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,278,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="612187784" Received: from nkrobins-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.220.19]) ([10.212.220.19]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Aug 2022 11:24:52 -0700 Message-ID: <37c35ede-b453-0d62-cee6-802ef98ae1ff@intel.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:24:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/sgx: A collection of tests and fixes Content-Language: en-US To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Haitao Huang , Vijay Dhanraj , Reinette Chatre , Dave Hansen , Paul Menzel References: <20220831173829.126661-1-jarkko@kernel.org> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org On 8/31/22 11:11, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:43:05AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >> Jarkko, >> >> What is your expectations of this series? There's nothing in the cover >> letter. >> >> Do you think all of this is urgent material that needs to go to Linus >> for 6.0? Or is it all 6.1 material? > Hmm... Let me think. > > I would pick exactly 2/6 and 3/6 and postpone rest for 6.1. > > 2/6 is IMHO critical fix and 3/6 is fix for a commit that > is part of 6.0. That's really great context, thanks! Next time, could you please include that in your cover letter(s) and split the patches up between urgent non-urgent bits?