From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/sgx: Fix sgx_encl_may_map locking
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 07:28:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f1b6d7e-1990-925b-c124-adfef7f2ddfc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201005141119.5395-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
On 10/5/20 7:11 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> + unsigned long count = 0;
...
> + xas_lock(&xas);
> + xas_for_each(&xas, page, idx_end) {
> + if (++count % XA_CHECK_SCHED)
> + continue;
Let's slow down and think through the loop, please.
First time through the loop, count=0, XA_CHECK_SCHED=4096, it will do a
++count, and now count=1. (count % XA_CHECK_SCHED) == 1. It will
continue. It skips the page->vm_max_prot_bits checks.
Next time through the loop, count=1, XA_CHECK_SCHED=4096, it will do a
++count, and now count=2. (count % XA_CHECK_SCHED) == 2. It will
continue. It skips the page->vm_max_prot_bits checks.
...
It will do this until it hits count=4095 where it will actually fall
into the rest of the loop, doing the page->vm_max_prot_bits checks.
So, in the end the loop only does what it's supposed to be doing 1/4096
times. Not great. Don't we have tests that will notice breakage like this?
The XA_CHECK_SCHED needs to be stuck near the *end* of the loop, just
before the lock dropping and resched stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-05 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-05 14:11 [PATCH v3] x86/sgx: Fix sgx_encl_may_map locking Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 14:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-05 17:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 17:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 14:28 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2020-10-05 17:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 15:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-05 17:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-05 17:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f1b6d7e-1990-925b-c124-adfef7f2ddfc@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).