From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C623ECAAD5 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230129AbiH2M5i (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:57:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54666 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230055AbiH2M4g (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:56:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x349.google.com (mail-wm1-x349.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::349]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F556416 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x349.google.com with SMTP id ay27-20020a05600c1e1b00b003a5bff0df8dso5968920wmb.0 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc; bh=tHogyOz5U0y7+H4DYPxiXG1ukMrOYP0VQiSgNpC/zOM=; b=rToQIqGvSV9gtHxU6/haFwVvhDbNuIXIAJ8mLeS71jKMZ8uIbmDa6I+Xx8uSHEYE2Q 8TUo8uYJtrXeNC0kju/+pAa3u6BcejatiMjxerNjN7jXaAgPisxjmZkH9iC3/4zTdN76 UfqrMKYs5pXmcItmuiIasOQ8UNASt288FZ/xBL2p/GC29D1+vcw2OBOIedIsdKH3yJgE Fud5R+reC/TBdAdfycV0lDis2b5V33c/1lglvQfxKDhti08R2zRYzOBWAqongTkbFUwB uUR7Kq3u7r7eXXozNcGskPFBrQXEyi/grPIc8n03qsJr2WVzx0H/ouS+FYb3au1Ss2xN Q0GQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=tHogyOz5U0y7+H4DYPxiXG1ukMrOYP0VQiSgNpC/zOM=; b=TXhHS/TzPRVD1s1iUZj56R5LsayeXs7yBXleSRR1IFxQnirXt/oXh0kkCVZ76X+vEF nQuSR03xYqKIDvjmW9qxfcQFfhBlm10/cfe04PcgC6zBz1BVkLm44m2LoZWu8lmesofa 9lQQLjg8vfHkT75ajSdPc9McArPpOVUlfu036hcw98ljODZVPKQ22ly3q8P5f+EjkZdA CnjpvPMKtMe+74SAvwYlgIV2105lfcm9B9FDm5UlOh5C1dDU9bPb65wmPDFaSQMH4ewc CmTehEFBRjfQRTvgu3Ygtgmzhb6x89ehXL5vEjr61G9qZDGYqiWmEfp93miBLvTmVBZf svSw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2+W/I0WVADAk3dpIt3FebS6Wwan74eWx3YE+r9O1ONwJ1qpuqp Bvr6q0NA/qcVQSXD9TKX2azI+4BQyQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6mjLHHe6v8lJspMAXsC84vRaEP6nUqGZxInQUwQrF8DKnZLiGJY7VnOBMh0yWsleS0xeEpvdvhgQ== X-Received: from elver.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:9c:201:196d:4fc7:fa9c:62e3]) (user=elver job=sendgmr) by 2002:a5d:5048:0:b0:226:df3b:72f4 with SMTP id h8-20020a5d5048000000b00226df3b72f4mr1036162wrt.205.1661777314053; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:47:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220829124719.675715-1-elver@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220829124719.675715-1-elver@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog Message-ID: <20220829124719.675715-14-elver@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v4 13/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize max_bp_pinned_slots() for CPU-independent task targets From: Marco Elver To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Dmitry Vyukov , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Running the perf benchmark with (note: more aggressive parameters vs. preceding changes, but same 256 CPUs host): | $> perf bench -r 100 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 128 -t 512 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 100 threads with 4 breakpoints and 128 parallelism | Total time: 1.989 [sec] | | 38.854160 usecs/op | 4973.332500 usecs/op/cpu 20.43% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath 18.75% [kernel] [k] osq_lock 16.98% [kernel] [k] rhashtable_jhash2 8.34% [kernel] [k] task_bp_pinned 4.23% [kernel] [k] smp_cfm_core_cond 3.65% [kernel] [k] bcmp 2.83% [kernel] [k] toggle_bp_slot 1.87% [kernel] [k] find_next_bit 1.49% [kernel] [k] __reserve_bp_slot We can see that a majority of the time is now spent hashing task pointers to index into task_bps_ht in task_bp_pinned(). Obtaining the max_bp_pinned_slots() for CPU-independent task targets currently is O(#cpus), and calls task_bp_pinned() for each CPU, even if the result of task_bp_pinned() is CPU-independent. The loop in max_bp_pinned_slots() wants to compute the maximum slots across all CPUs. If task_bp_pinned() is CPU-independent, we can do so by obtaining the max slots across all CPUs and adding task_bp_pinned(). To do so in O(1), use a bp_slots_histogram for CPU-pinned slots. After this optimization: | $> perf bench -r 100 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 128 -t 512 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 100 threads with 4 breakpoints and 128 parallelism | Total time: 1.930 [sec] | | 37.697832 usecs/op | 4825.322500 usecs/op/cpu 19.13% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath 18.21% [kernel] [k] rhashtable_jhash2 15.46% [kernel] [k] osq_lock 6.27% [kernel] [k] toggle_bp_slot 5.91% [kernel] [k] task_bp_pinned 5.05% [kernel] [k] smp_cfm_core_cond 1.78% [kernel] [k] update_sg_lb_stats 1.36% [kernel] [k] llist_reverse_order 1.34% [kernel] [k] find_next_bit 1.19% [kernel] [k] bcmp Suggesting that time spent in task_bp_pinned() has been reduced. However, we're still hashing too much, which will be addressed in the subsequent change. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov Acked-by: Ian Rogers --- v3: * Update hw_breakpoint_is_used() to include global cpu_pinned. v2: * New patch. --- kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c index 03ebecf048c0..a489f31fe147 100644 --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ static struct bp_cpuinfo *get_bp_info(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) return per_cpu_ptr(bp_cpuinfo + type, cpu); } +/* Number of pinned CPU breakpoints globally. */ +static struct bp_slots_histogram cpu_pinned[TYPE_MAX]; + /* Keep track of the breakpoints attached to tasks */ static struct rhltable task_bps_ht; static const struct rhashtable_params task_bps_ht_params = { @@ -194,6 +197,10 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) goto err; } } + for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++) { + if (!bp_slots_histogram_alloc(&cpu_pinned[i], i)) + goto err; + } return 0; err: @@ -203,6 +210,8 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) if (err_cpu == cpu) break; } + for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++) + bp_slots_histogram_free(&cpu_pinned[i]); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -270,6 +279,9 @@ static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) /* * Count the number of breakpoints of the same type and same task. * The given event must be not on the list. + * + * If @cpu is -1, but the result of task_bp_pinned() is not CPU-independent, + * returns a negative value. */ static int task_bp_pinned(int cpu, struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type) { @@ -288,9 +300,18 @@ static int task_bp_pinned(int cpu, struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type) goto out; rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(iter, pos, head, hw.bp_list) { - if (find_slot_idx(iter->attr.bp_type) == type && - (iter->cpu < 0 || cpu == iter->cpu)) - count += hw_breakpoint_weight(iter); + if (find_slot_idx(iter->attr.bp_type) != type) + continue; + + if (iter->cpu >= 0) { + if (cpu == -1) { + count = -1; + goto out; + } else if (cpu != iter->cpu) + continue; + } + + count += hw_breakpoint_weight(iter); } out: @@ -316,6 +337,19 @@ max_bp_pinned_slots(struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type) int pinned_slots = 0; int cpu; + if (bp->hw.target && bp->cpu < 0) { + int max_pinned = task_bp_pinned(-1, bp, type); + + if (max_pinned >= 0) { + /* + * Fast path: task_bp_pinned() is CPU-independent and + * returns the same value for any CPU. + */ + max_pinned += bp_slots_histogram_max(&cpu_pinned[type], type); + return max_pinned; + } + } + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) { struct bp_cpuinfo *info = get_bp_info(cpu, type); int nr; @@ -366,8 +400,11 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type, /* Pinned counter cpu profiling */ if (!bp->hw.target) { + struct bp_cpuinfo *info = get_bp_info(bp->cpu, type); + lockdep_assert_held_write(&bp_cpuinfo_sem); - get_bp_info(bp->cpu, type)->cpu_pinned += weight; + bp_slots_histogram_add(&cpu_pinned[type], info->cpu_pinned, weight); + info->cpu_pinned += weight; return 0; } @@ -804,6 +841,18 @@ bool hw_breakpoint_is_used(void) } } + for (int type = 0; type < TYPE_MAX; ++type) { + for (int slot = 0; slot < hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(type); ++slot) { + /* + * Warn, because if there are CPU pinned counters, + * should never get here; bp_cpuinfo::cpu_pinned should + * be consistent with the global cpu_pinned histogram. + */ + if (WARN_ON(atomic_read(&cpu_pinned[type].count[slot]))) + return true; + } + } + return false; } -- 2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog