From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24DEC4743F for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8413261183 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233598AbhFHO7g (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 10:59:36 -0400 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([93.17.236.30]:26169 "EHLO pegase1.c-s.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233540AbhFHO7f (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 10:59:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [192.168.12.233]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FztdJ6WHszBDj8; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:57:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYF-J-sCzJxT; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FztdJ5XkGzBDj7; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A608B7BF; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:57:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id Kq4BMwCmb5qz; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2B78B7C0; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:57:39 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 resend 01/15] mm: add setup_initial_init_mm() helper To: Souptick Joarder , Kefeng Wang Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, X86 ML , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Linux-MM , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Andrew Morton , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20210608083418.137226-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <20210608083418.137226-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: <34f88fdc-1842-7954-bccc-0142a8d66eea@csgroup.eu> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:57:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Le 08/06/2021 à 16:53, Souptick Joarder a écrit : > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 1:56 PM Kefeng Wang wrote: >> >> Add setup_initial_init_mm() helper to setup kernel text, >> data and brk. >> >> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp >> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org >> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: x86@kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang >> --- >> include/linux/mm.h | 3 +++ >> mm/init-mm.c | 9 +++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h >> index c274f75efcf9..02aa057540b7 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h >> @@ -244,6 +244,9 @@ int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping, >> >> #define lru_to_page(head) (list_entry((head)->prev, struct page, lru)) >> >> +void setup_initial_init_mm(void *start_code, void *end_code, >> + void *end_data, void *brk); >> + > > Gentle query -> is there any limitation to add inline functions in > setup_arch() functions ? Kefeng just followed comment from Mike I guess, see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20210604070633.32363-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/#2696253 Christophe