Pull Request for 5.9

Pull Request for 5.9

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

Hi Rich!

Any chance you can send the pull request to Linus for 5.9?

I would like to see my get_user() patch merged as otherwise libsecomp upstream
won't allow me to open the PR to get the userland changes merged for SECCOMP
support.

Thanks,
Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Pull Request for 5.9

[Rich Felker]

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 09:36:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Rich!
> 
> Any chance you can send the pull request to Linus for 5.9?
> 
> I would like to see my get_user() patch merged as otherwise libsecomp upstream
> won't allow me to open the PR to get the userland changes merged for SECCOMP
> support.

Yep, it's on my todo for this week. I'll try to get to it today. Does
everything in next look good to you?

Rich

Re: Pull Request for 5.9

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

On 8/7/20 8:34 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 09:36:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Hi Rich!
>>
>> Any chance you can send the pull request to Linus for 5.9?
>>
>> I would like to see my get_user() patch merged as otherwise libsecomp upstream
>> won't allow me to open the PR to get the userland changes merged for SECCOMP
>> support.
> 
> Yep, it's on my todo for this week. I'll try to get to it today. Does
> everything in next look good to you?

I haven't done testing on next yet, but I will do that by Sunday - at latest.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Pull Request for 5.9

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

Hi Rich!

Building -next on SH is currently broken:

make[1]: 'include/generated/machtypes.h' is up to date.
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
<stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
  CALL    scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
  CHK     include/generated/compile.h
  CC      arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.o
arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c:168:5: error: conflicting types for ‘fpregs_get’
  168 | int fpregs_get(struct task_struct *target,
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c:31:
./arch/sh/include/asm/fpu.h:40:12: note: previous declaration of ‘fpregs_get’ was here
   40 | extern int fpregs_get(struct task_struct *target,
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.o] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:1789: arch/sh/kernel] Error 2

This regression was introduced by:

commit 3399d90ce63edf7439900db50b5c02aa822f190b
Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue Jun 16 00:54:51 2020 -0400

    sh: convert to ->regset_get()

    NB: there's a direct call of fpregs_get() left in dump_fpu().
    To be taken out once we convert ELF_FDPIC to use of regset.

    Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

 arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c |  5 ++---
 arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c  | 48 ++++++++++-----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Pull Request for 5.9

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

Hi Rich!

On 8/7/20 8:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 8/7/20 8:34 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 09:36:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> Hi Rich!
>>>
>>> Any chance you can send the pull request to Linus for 5.9?
>>>
>>> I would like to see my get_user() patch merged as otherwise libsecomp upstream
>>> won't allow me to open the PR to get the userland changes merged for SECCOMP
>>> support.
>>
>> Yep, it's on my todo for this week. I'll try to get to it today. Does
>> everything in next look good to you?
> 
> I haven't done testing on next yet, but I will do that by Sunday - at latest.

From my side, everything is fine now. Al has sent a PR to Linus fixing the
one issue I found in -next. So I think you can send out the PR now.

Then we can sort through the other patches for SH which might have not been
picked up through any of the other trees yet.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913