linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 17:10:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+aA7QkAsufv6EMQ1O8mZaVd-eNOqRrx2a7qvPR4Tt=izA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704150514.48816-2-elver@google.com>

On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 17:06, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> Add KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting, with various
> interesting mixes of breakpoint targets (some care was taken to catch
> interesting corner cases via bug-injection).
>
> The test cannot be built as a module because it requires access to
> hw_breakpoint_slots(), which is not inlinable or exported on all
> architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>

> ---
> v3:
> * Don't use raw_smp_processor_id().
>
> v2:
> * New patch.
> ---
>  kernel/events/Makefile             |   1 +
>  kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/Kconfig.debug                  |  10 +
>  3 files changed, 334 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/Makefile b/kernel/events/Makefile
> index 8591c180b52b..91a62f566743 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/events/Makefile
> @@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
>  obj-y := core.o ring_buffer.o callchain.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST) += hw_breakpoint_test.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o
> diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..433c5c45e2a5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting logic.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC.
> + */
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/hw_breakpoint.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
> +
> +#define TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, slots)                                            \
> +       do {                                                                            \
> +               if ((slots) > get_test_bp_slots()) {                                    \
> +                       kunit_skip((test), "Requires breakpoint slots: %d > %d", slots, \
> +                                  get_test_bp_slots());                                \
> +               }                                                                       \
> +       } while (0)
> +
> +#define TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(expr) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOSPC, PTR_ERR(expr))
> +
> +#define MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS 512
> +
> +static char break_vars[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
> +static struct perf_event *test_bps[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
> +static struct task_struct *__other_task;
> +
> +static struct perf_event *register_test_bp(int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int idx)
> +{
> +       struct perf_event_attr attr = {};
> +
> +       if (WARN_ON(idx < 0 || idx >= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS))
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       hw_breakpoint_init(&attr);
> +       attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)&break_vars[idx];
> +       attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1;
> +       attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_RW;
> +       return perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, cpu, tsk, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void unregister_test_bp(struct perf_event **bp)
> +{
> +       if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(*bp)))
> +               return;
> +       if (WARN_ON(!*bp))
> +               return;
> +       unregister_hw_breakpoint(*bp);
> +       *bp = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_test_bp_slots(void)
> +{
> +       static int slots;
> +
> +       if (!slots)
> +               slots = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA);
> +
> +       return slots;
> +}
> +
> +static void fill_one_bp_slot(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +       struct perf_event *bp = register_test_bp(cpu, tsk, *id);
> +
> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, bp);
> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(bp));
> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, test_bps[*id]);
> +       test_bps[(*id)++] = bp;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Fills up the given @cpu/@tsk with breakpoints, only leaving @skip slots free.
> + *
> + * Returns true if this can be called again, continuing at @id.
> + */
> +static bool fill_bp_slots(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int skip)
> +{
> +       for (int i = 0; i < get_test_bp_slots() - skip; ++i)
> +               fill_one_bp_slot(test, id, cpu, tsk);
> +
> +       return *id + get_test_bp_slots() <= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS;
> +}
> +
> +static int dummy_kthread(void *arg)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct task_struct *get_other_task(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> +       if (__other_task)
> +               return __other_task;
> +
> +       tsk = kthread_create(dummy_kthread, NULL, "hw_breakpoint_dummy_task");
> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(tsk));
> +       __other_task = tsk;
> +       return __other_task;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_test_cpu(int num)
> +{
> +       int cpu;
> +
> +       WARN_ON(num < 0);
> +
> +       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +               if (num-- <= 0)
> +                       break;
> +       }
> +
> +       return cpu;
> +}
> +
> +/* ===== Test cases ===== */
> +
> +static void test_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL, 0);
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_many_cpus(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +       int cpu;
> +
> +       /* Test that CPUs are independent. */
> +       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +               bool do_continue = fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, cpu, NULL, 0);
> +
> +               TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(cpu, NULL, idx));
> +               if (!do_continue)
> +                       break;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static void test_one_task_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +       /* Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work. */
> +       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       /* Test that tasks are independent. */
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
> +
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +       /* Remove one from first task and adding back CPU-target should not work. */
> +       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_one_task_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +       /*
> +        * Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work; this case is
> +        * special vs. above because the task's constraints are CPU-dependent.
> +        */
> +       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_one_task_mixed(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
> +
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 1);
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +
> +       /* Transition from CPU-dependent pinned count to CPU-independent. */
> +       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
> +       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[1]);
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), 0);
> +
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +       /* Can still create breakpoints on some other CPU. */
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
> +
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +       /* Cannot create breakpoints on some other CPU either. */
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       int tsk_on_cpu_idx, cpu_idx;
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
> +
> +       fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 2);
> +       /* Transitioning from only all CPU breakpoints to mixed. */
> +       tsk_on_cpu_idx = idx;
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
> +
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +
> +       /* We should still be able to use up another CPU's slots. */
> +       cpu_idx = idx;
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL);
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
> +
> +       /* Transitioning back to task target on all CPUs. */
> +       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[tsk_on_cpu_idx]);
> +       /* Still have a CPU target breakpoint in get_test_cpu(1). */
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       /* Remove it and try again. */
> +       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[cpu_idx]);
> +       fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
> +
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
> +       TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case hw_breakpoint_test_cases[] = {
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_one_cpu),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_many_cpus),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_all_cpus),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_one_cpu),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_mixed),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus),
> +       KUNIT_CASE(test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu),
> +       {},
> +};
> +
> +static int test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       /* Most test cases want 2 distinct CPUs. */
> +       return num_online_cpus() < 2 ? -EINVAL : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_exit(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       for (int i = 0; i < MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; ++i) {
> +               if (test_bps[i])
> +                       unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[i]);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (__other_task) {
> +               kthread_stop(__other_task);
> +               __other_task = NULL;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite hw_breakpoint_test_suite = {
> +       .name = "hw_breakpoint",
> +       .test_cases = hw_breakpoint_test_cases,
> +       .init = test_init,
> +       .exit = test_exit,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(&hw_breakpoint_test_suite);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Marco Elver <elver@google.com>");
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 2e24db4bff19..4c87a6edf046 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST
>           CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
>           or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
>
> +config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST
> +       bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +       depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> +       depends on KUNIT=y
> +       default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +       help
> +         Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting.
> +
> +         If unsure, say N.
> +
>  config TEST_UDELAY
>         tristate "udelay test driver"
>         help
> --
> 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-04 15:05 [PATCH v3 00/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize for thousands of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:10   ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2022-07-20 15:22     ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21 16:22   ` Mark Rutland
2022-07-22  9:10     ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22  9:20       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 10:10         ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 10:31           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 11:03             ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 13:41               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-25 11:00     ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Provide hw_breakpoint_is_used() and use in test Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:09   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-20 15:22     ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Clean up headers Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:23   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize list of per-task breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:29   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:39     ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Mark data __ro_after_init Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:30   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize constant number of breakpoint slots Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:31   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Make hw_breakpoint_weight() inlinable Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:32   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Remove useless code related to flexible breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:34   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: Avoid relying on caller synchronization Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:35   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] locking/percpu-rwsem: Add percpu_is_write_locked() and percpu_is_read_locked() Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:36   ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-17 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29  6:00     ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Reduce contention with large number of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:38   ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-17 13:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 13:14     ` Marco Elver
2022-08-29  8:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29  9:38         ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Introduce bp_slots_histogram Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:40   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize max_bp_pinned_slots() for CPU-independent task targets Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:42   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize toggle_bp_slot() " Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:44   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-12 13:39 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize for thousands of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:47   ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-16 14:12     ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACT4Y+aA7QkAsufv6EMQ1O8mZaVd-eNOqRrx2a7qvPR4Tt=izA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).