From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/27] x86/syscalls: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings from COND_SYSCALL()
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:59:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd37a7f2-55e1-2e96-0c93-4a40980b8ef2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210128005110.2613902-3-masahiroy@kernel.org>
Hello!
On 28.01.2021 3:50, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Building kernel/sys_ni.c with W=1 omits tons of -Wmissing-prototypes
Emits?
> warnings.
>
> $ make W=1 kernel/sys_ni.o
> [ snip ]
> CC kernel/sys_ni.o
> In file included from kernel/sys_ni.c:10:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:83:14: warning: no previous prototype for '__x64_sys_io_setup' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 83 | __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
> | ^~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:100:2: note: in expansion of macro '__COND_SYSCALL'
> 100 | __COND_SYSCALL(x64, sys_##name)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:256:2: note: in expansion of macro '__X64_COND_SYSCALL'
> 256 | __X64_COND_SYSCALL(name) \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/sys_ni.c:39:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COND_SYSCALL'
> 39 | COND_SYSCALL(io_setup);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:83:14: warning: no previous prototype for '__ia32_sys_io_setup' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 83 | __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
> | ^~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:120:2: note: in expansion of macro '__COND_SYSCALL'
> 120 | __COND_SYSCALL(ia32, sys_##name)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:257:2: note: in expansion of macro '__IA32_COND_SYSCALL'
> 257 | __IA32_COND_SYSCALL(name)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/sys_ni.c:39:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COND_SYSCALL'
> 39 | COND_SYSCALL(io_setup);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> ...
>
> __SYS_STUB0() and __SYS_STUBx() defined a few lines above have forward
> declarations. Let's do likewise for __COND_SYSCALL() to fix the
> warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> index a84333adeef2..80c08c7d5e72 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ extern long __ia32_sys_ni_syscall(const struct pt_regs *regs);
> }
>
> #define __COND_SYSCALL(abi, name) \
> + __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused); \
> __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
Aren't these two lines identical?
[...]
MBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 0:50 [PATCH 00/27] arch: syscalls: unifiy all syscalltbl.sh into scripts/syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 01/27] scripts: add generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 1:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 02/27] x86/syscalls: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings from COND_SYSCALL() Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:55 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 7:59 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2021-01-28 8:00 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 03/27] x86/build: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 04/27] x86/entry/x32: rename __x32_compat_sys_* to __x64_compat_sys_* Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 05/27] x86/syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 06/27] ARM: syscalls: " Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 07/27] alpha: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 08/27] alpha: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 09/27] ia64: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 10/27] ia64: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 11/27] m68k: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 7:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 12/27] m68k: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 8:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 13/27] microblaze: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 14/27] microblaze: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 15/27] mips: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 16/27] mips: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:50 ` [PATCH 17/27] parisc: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 18/27] parisc: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 19/27] sh: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 20/27] sh: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 21/27] sparc: remove wrong comment from arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-14 17:00 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 22/27] sparc: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 23/27] sparc: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 24/27] powerpc: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 25/27] powerpc: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 26/27] xtensa: add missing FORCE and fix 'targets' to make if_changed work Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-28 0:51 ` [PATCH 27/27] xtensa: syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-15 12:03 ` [PATCH 00/27] arch: syscalls: unifiy all syscalltbl.sh into scripts/syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd37a7f2-55e1-2e96-0c93-4a40980b8ef2@gmail.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).