Linux SNPS ARC Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: rppt@linux.ibm.com (Mike Rapoport)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/21] memblock: memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(): don't panic
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:32:52 +0200
Message-ID: <20190125193252.GH31519@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190125174502.GL25901@arrakis.emea.arm.com>

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019@05:45:02PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019@10:03:53AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> > index ae34e3a..2c61ea4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> > @@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn)
> >  		pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [<memory-less node>]\n", nid);
> >  
> >  	nd_pa = memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
> > +	if (!nd_pa)
> > +		panic("Cannot allocate %zu bytes for node %d data\n",
> > +		      nd_size, nid);
> > +
> >  	nd = __va(nd_pa);
> >  
> >  	/* report and initialize */
> 
> Does it mean that memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid() never returns valid
> physical memory starting at 0?

Yes, it does.
memblock_find_in_range_node() that is used by all allocation methods
skips the first page [1].
 
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/mm/memblock.c#n257

> -- 
> Catalin
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply index

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-21  8:03 [PATCH v2 00/21] Refine memblock API rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] openrisc: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address rppt
2019-01-27  3:07   ` shorne
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] powerpc: use memblock functions " rppt
2019-01-29  9:52   ` mpe
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] memblock: replace memblock_alloc_base(ANYWHERE) with memblock_phys_alloc rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] memblock: drop memblock_alloc_base_nid() rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] memblock: emphasize that memblock_alloc_range() returns a physical address rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] memblock: memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(): don't panic rppt
2019-01-25 17:45   ` catalin.marinas
2019-01-25 19:32     ` rppt [this message]
2019-01-29  9:56   ` mpe
2019-01-29  9:58     ` mpe
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] memblock: memblock_phys_alloc(): " rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] memblock: drop __memblock_alloc_base() rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] memblock: drop memblock_alloc_base() rppt
2019-01-29 10:29   ` mpe
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] memblock: refactor internal allocation functions rppt
2019-02-03  9:39   ` mpe
2019-02-03 10:04     ` rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] memblock: make memblock_find_in_range_node() and choose_memblock_flags() static rppt
2019-01-21  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] arch: use memblock_alloc() instead of memblock_alloc_from(size, align, 0) rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] arch: don't memset(0) memory returned by memblock_alloc() rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] ia64: add checks for the return value of memblock_alloc*() rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] sparc: " rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] mm/percpu: " rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] init/main: " rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] swiotlb: " rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] treewide: " rppt
2019-01-21  8:39   ` geert
2019-01-21 17:18   ` robh
2019-01-31  6:07   ` christophe.leroy
2019-01-31  6:41     ` rppt
2019-01-31  6:44       ` christophe.leroy
2019-01-31  7:07         ` christophe.leroy
2019-01-31  7:14           ` rppt
2019-01-31 15:23   ` jcmvbkbc
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] memblock: memblock_alloc_try_nid: don't panic rppt
2019-01-21  8:04 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] memblock: drop memblock_alloc_*_nopanic() variants rppt
2019-01-30 13:38   ` pmladek
2019-09-24 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] Refine memblock API aford173
2019-09-25 12:12   ` festevam
2019-09-25 12:17     ` aford173
2019-09-25 15:17       ` festevam
2019-09-26 13:09         ` aford173
2019-09-26 16:04           ` rppt
2019-09-26 19:35             ` aford173
2019-09-28  7:33               ` rppt
2019-09-29 13:33                 ` aford173
2019-10-02  0:14                   ` aford173
2019-10-02  7:36                     ` rppt
2019-10-02 11:14                       ` aford173

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190125193252.GH31519@rapoport-lnx \
    --to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux SNPS ARC Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-snps-arc/0 linux-snps-arc/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-snps-arc linux-snps-arc/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-snps-arc \
		linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
	public-inbox-index linux-snps-arc

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-snps-arc


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git