From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> Cc: "fweimer@redhat.com" <fweimer@redhat.com>, "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>, "palmerdabbelt@google.com" <palmerdabbelt@google.com>, "zongbox@gmail.com" <zongbox@gmail.com>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>, "adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org" <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>, "macro@wdc.com" <macro@wdc.com>, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>, arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:28:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20200220112843.76b8eb27@jawa> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3MTQf_fnEWiGVxzexZzYNQ34h29aNxH_YApmsVzY6OsA@mail.gmail.com> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2436 bytes --] Hi Arnd, Joseph, > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:46 AM Joseph Myers > <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > > > > The first 4 will need more work as sym aliasing like > > > strong_alias (__xstat64, __xstat) > > > > > > will be needed in those ARM files (which in turn use i386). > > > > The situation for Arm is fundamentally different from that for ARC. > > > > For ARC, you only need a single public stat structure (using 64-bit > > times and offsets). > > > > For Arm, a third public stat structure will need to be added > > alongside the existing two, initially used internally in > > 64-bit-time stat functions that aren't exported from glibc, > > eventually to be used with _TIME_BITS=64 with the 64-bit-time stat > > interfaces exported once all the _TIME_BITS=64 interfaces are > > ready. > > But surely that structure layout would be the same on ARM and ARC > as well as all other 32-bit architectures with _TIME_BITS=64, right? > For ARM32 stat case (current): ./io/stat.c -> __xstat -> ./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/xstat64.c and then struct stat64 buf is filled by the kernel. The generic idea (which requires converting ./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/xstat64.c) would be to use statx always in glibc instead of stat* syscalls (as it is done in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/xstat64.c) To do that we do need in-glibc internal new type - namely struct stat64_time64 which would have always: __time64_t st_atime; (and st_mtime, st_ctime). instead of __time_t st_atime; and also introduce __cp_stat64_time64_statx along with __cp_stat64_statx as struct statx inherently support 64 bit time via struct statx_timestamp even on 32 bit archs. IMHO using statx as widely as possible in glibc is the easiest way to convert stat* and friends functions to support Y2038. > What's wrong with having a single implementation for the most > recent set of stat syscalls, with the older variants being only > compiled for architectures that need them to support _TIME_BITS=32 > and/or _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=32? > > Arnd Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de [-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <cover.1578824547.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> [not found] ` <4e95f95966d8d7c6a8339160dc62d81c1f6a1bfb.1578824547.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> 2020-02-12 0:14 ` Vineet Gupta 2020-02-12 0:14 ` Alistair Francis 2020-02-12 1:30 ` Joseph Myers 2020-02-14 22:39 ` Alistair Francis 2020-02-18 23:05 ` switching ARC to 64-bit time_t (Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64) Vineet Gupta 2020-02-18 23:13 ` Joseph Myers 2020-02-19 23:09 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-19 23:11 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-20 8:31 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-20 9:37 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-20 12:37 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-20 13:14 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-20 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-20 15:42 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-20 16:08 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-20 16:31 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-24 2:48 ` Viresh Kumar 2020-02-21 19:56 ` Alistair Francis 2020-02-22 8:42 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-24 9:00 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-24 9:46 ` Andreas Schwab 2020-02-24 10:14 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-24 10:23 ` Andreas Schwab 2020-02-24 10:36 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-24 10:42 ` Andreas Schwab 2020-02-24 11:13 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-24 12:41 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-25 0:03 ` Joseph Myers 2020-02-25 11:39 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-25 14:36 ` Joseph Myers 2020-02-26 13:18 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-26 14:48 ` Joseph Myers 2020-02-26 16:28 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-25 9:03 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-20 16:27 ` Helmut Grohne 2020-03-26 0:25 ` ARC rebootstrap prereq (was Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t ) Vineet Gupta 2020-03-26 5:54 ` Helmut Grohne 2020-03-26 11:51 ` Alexey Brodkin 2020-03-26 12:24 ` Helmut Grohne 2020-03-26 12:53 ` Alexey Brodkin 2020-03-26 14:28 ` Helmut Grohne 2020-03-26 19:04 ` Lennart Sorensen 2020-08-26 14:39 ` Vineet Gupta 2020-08-26 15:43 ` Helmut Grohne 2020-08-26 21:16 ` Aurelien Jarno 2021-02-24 20:17 ` Vineet Gupta 2021-02-26 9:47 ` Helmut Grohne 2021-02-26 15:58 ` Vineet Gupta 2020-02-12 1:42 ` [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64 Vineet Gupta 2020-02-12 12:58 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-19 0:56 ` Vineet Gupta 2020-02-19 1:03 ` Alistair Francis 2020-02-19 1:31 ` Vineet Gupta 2020-02-19 8:30 ` Andreas Schwab 2020-02-19 18:42 ` Vineet Gupta 2020-02-19 23:18 ` Lukasz Majewski 2020-02-20 0:26 ` Vineet Gupta 2020-02-20 0:46 ` Joseph Myers 2020-02-20 8:24 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-02-20 10:28 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message] 2020-02-20 14:14 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200220112843.76b8eb27@jawa \ --to=lukma@denx.de \ --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \ --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \ --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \ --cc=alistair23@gmail.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \ --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \ --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \ --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=macro@wdc.com \ --cc=palmerdabbelt@google.com \ --cc=schwab@suse.de \ --cc=zongbox@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux SNPS ARC Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-snps-arc/0 linux-snps-arc/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-snps-arc linux-snps-arc/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-snps-arc \ linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org public-inbox-index linux-snps-arc Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-snps-arc AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git