From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
x86@kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:04:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230322140434.GC2357380@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xhsmhmt45c703.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:20:28PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 22/03/23 10:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hurmph... so we only really consume @func when we IPI. Would it not be
> > more useful to trace this thing for *every* csd enqeued?
>
> It's true that any CSD enqueued on that CPU's call_single_queue in the
> [first CSD llist_add()'ed, IPI IRQ hits] timeframe is a potential source of
> interference.
>
> However, can we be sure that first CSD isn't an indirect cause for the
> following ones? say the target CPU exits RCU EQS due to the IPI, there's a
> bit of time before it gets to flush_smp_call_function_queue() where some other CSD
> could be enqueued *because* of that change in state.
>
> I couldn't find a easy example of that, I might be biased as this is where
> I'd like to go wrt IPI'ing isolated CPUs in usermode. But regardless, when
> correlating an IPI IRQ with its source, we'd always have to look at the
> first CSD in that CSD stack.
So I was thinking something like this:
---
Subject: trace,smp: Trace all smp_function_call*() invocations
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed Mar 22 14:58:36 CET 2023
(Ab)use the trace_ipi_send_cpu*() family to trace all
smp_function_call*() invocations, not only those that result in an
actual IPI.
The queued entries log their callback function while the actual IPIs
are traced on generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/smp.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -106,18 +106,20 @@ void __init call_function_init(void)
}
static __always_inline void
-send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func)
+send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
{
if (call_function_single_prep_ipi(cpu)) {
- trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_, func);
+ trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_,
+ generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt);
arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
}
}
static __always_inline void
-send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func)
+send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
{
- trace_ipi_send_cpumask(mask, _RET_IP_, func);
+ trace_ipi_send_cpumask(mask, _RET_IP_,
+ generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt);
arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(mask);
}
@@ -318,25 +320,6 @@ static __always_inline void csd_unlock(s
smp_store_release(&csd->node.u_flags, 0);
}
-static __always_inline void
-raw_smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node, smp_call_func_t func)
-{
- /*
- * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
- * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
- * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
- * llist ops.
- *
- * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
- * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
- * to arch code to make it appear to obey cache coherency WRT
- * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
- * equipped to do the right thing...
- */
- if (llist_add(node, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
- send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu, func);
-}
-
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(call_single_data_t, csd_data);
void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
@@ -356,10 +339,23 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, st
func = CSD_TYPE(csd) == CSD_TYPE_TTWU ?
sched_ttwu_pending : csd->func;
- raw_smp_call_single_queue(cpu, node, func);
- } else {
- raw_smp_call_single_queue(cpu, node, NULL);
+ trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_, func);
}
+
+ /*
+ * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+ * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+ * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+ * llist ops.
+ *
+ * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
+ * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
+ * to arch code to make it appear to obey cache coherency WRT
+ * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
+ * equipped to do the right thing...
+ */
+ if (llist_add(node, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
+ send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
}
/*
@@ -798,14 +794,20 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
}
/*
+ * Trace each smp_function_call_*() as an IPI, actual IPIs
+ * will be traced with func==generic_smp_call_function_single_ipi().
+ */
+ trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cfd->cpumask_ipi, _RET_IP_, func);
+
+ /*
* Choose the most efficient way to send an IPI. Note that the
* number of CPUs might be zero due to concurrent changes to the
* provided mask.
*/
if (nr_cpus == 1)
- send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu, func);
+ send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu);
else if (likely(nr_cpus > 1))
- send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi, func);
+ send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
}
if (run_local && (!cond_func || cond_func(this_cpu, info))) {
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-22 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-07 14:35 [PATCH v5 0/7] Generic IPI sending tracepoint Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpumask() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 11:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] sched, smp: Trace IPIs sent via send_call_function_single_ipi() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] smp: Trace IPIs sent via arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] treewide: Trace IPIs sent via smp_send_reschedule() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] smp: reword smp call IPI comment Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 12:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-03-22 17:01 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 18:22 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 23:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-23 16:25 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-23 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-23 18:31 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230322140434.GC2357380@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).