From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anshuman.khandual@arm.com (Anshuman Khandual) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:28:08 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] mm/pgtable/debug: Fix test validating architecture page table helpers In-Reply-To: <1892b37d1fd9a4ed39e76c4b999b6556077201c0.1568355752.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> References: <1892b37d1fd9a4ed39e76c4b999b6556077201c0.1568355752.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> List-ID: Message-ID: <527dd29d-45fa-4d83-1899-6cbf268dd749@arm.com> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org On 09/13/2019 11:53 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Fix build failure on powerpc. > > Fix preemption imbalance. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > --- > mm/arch_pgtable_test.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/arch_pgtable_test.c b/mm/arch_pgtable_test.c > index 8b4a92756ad8..f2b3c9ec35fa 100644 > --- a/mm/arch_pgtable_test.c > +++ b/mm/arch_pgtable_test.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include This is okay. > #include > #include > > @@ -400,6 +401,8 @@ static int __init arch_pgtable_tests_init(void) > p4d_clear_tests(p4dp); > pgd_clear_tests(mm, pgdp); > > + pte_unmap(ptep); > + Now the preemption imbalance via pte_alloc_map() path i.e pte_alloc_map() -> pte_offset_map() -> kmap_atomic() Is not this very much powerpc 32 specific or this will be applicable for all platform which uses kmap_XXX() to map high memory ?