From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86874C35DF9 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE942176D for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Rl6QQVMR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4EE942176D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZD0Zf+3Oa8Ma0UFH4wtgr0MKzwLzAfwZr6pPV0bmaPQ=; b=Rl6QQVMR2hbpBM yuNu0bnMQ6IoyLJrTT4/UYG47+x967dFfU1ulXxCF/ztll0I13d++9D5SZiFQQYw20rWtHTkQ+2nZ fgSDMt8ol9JJc2jVa1191/SymR950uqngZ8JOXOrV42yhW5r+i/2voZU36lkSh4/V9UyBtSyOgVMz BlGmerZ+kPVg5be/TPll6xAlVQtLbidJUoVN5lmkRLXlYdPr0/3HZ8FwTZVWrrkzyMQyLvsrsB6yS c7QwFTqSP2HV1tN9Zkd5N3QJAF2NYpcdcO2dISLpahyNtsZYnG0z7p3VB/oRRejl5PiNoXpD4pUIu FA36Ac1QW5rzpXUYSM2w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j6W85-00075s-TS; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:03:49 +0000 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j6W82-000755-Gx for linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:03:48 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [212.227.15.129]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MirSu-1ja6Be202e-00ewTQ for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:03:42 +0100 Received: by mail-qt1-f171.google.com with SMTP id i14so8540613qtv.13 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 01:03:42 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUDtxhptxgdqyXyiLQf+hzsNtQ9I2LMH+f+rR7FSKdgVFCSDMwu JmPudiGu6VvvvO6Gfo8N6dTplYJwMds74Zcgn24= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz2Nlvq0/ymXJ8nzMWbmz10VulqVGCLhof0TnaomIgYfe7qOw0s9Bo+kyead03UAkcYvU5UkEM74/NMnsLw2yk= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5182:: with SMTP id c2mr4857743qtn.142.1582621421263; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 01:03:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4e95f95966d8d7c6a8339160dc62d81c1f6a1bfb.1578824547.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> <00574bfb-981a-3a1c-cbdf-b2fee4eddc32@gmail.com> <8a9784b3-fc52-adc3-4595-33142b059388@synopsys.com> <20200220001136.2f14236e@jawa> <20200220103716.2f526933@jawa> <20200224100051.2511d797@jawa> In-Reply-To: <20200224100051.2511d797@jawa> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:03:29 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t (Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64) To: Lukasz Majewski X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:lsnuBy75F3f+t5MUJ8j2lDTeFZ5KrNc3usVxZdVGY4AJXVlUfNt 2BYfFQgynmE+DvvpgK9m/xR+zHr8dRn3gxUIuJBGZxgSUcSCJ99rwPxC6vry5kSPQE7MnlT ENxtNMXWUvXpJyZTqVJrlKQ0e1kjjlIH0HWFRhVu2v5vQCWMqmvxopbsP6pQYHqN3XHnvpv 4yI1OtI2x6m7iU6MXov9A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:aZOmXdBfNr8=:iFs5BcfNXaD8NXYMJi5OjE +x+xKk8ivJyqERN4O+4tHi8Z25Iv3VeGcSEdZLBlsUceudE6s6FC9RND6FkZhEE+vCgtO71gh Nc0Q0rVXF43bUEc7PzGRYP803M1Vb1nijkUqCFJMol+Bx+tyN73CqsInDC6rza2ndJaORtbiM MVz/naI1doehk3BSESGKQVqvQT0r/OnvYO8x7hL2z1V0OmeWjlFmb1La/Co63XOk3br6mmdKD QBxMRiyf1dGYQZmjkZmSg31LG8sibaBUORRg2jLKfq3IiNFmAaydKvyMQbABOC5b+kfOjABDa GSRCBfHBV5bEfGqWCckst91YlHmBlHmNf2Qm9d9KKFYhN19MLuWK7E1yXoXV6PugIuc/KrNtj F24vRJU4jT7xl+becUdL/hBk0biuhPFtFGoHsW8eFAX+zTbDF5OziLGdB0jdakubBqv/TMVhE zBUcC31c7RwaOlu4i+zEObjOne8Ae8nNrrn23UEmk+fgzKpuQJUx8NfwpEcgfp+ajcI8wd4oz nj5+YvUjoi34G6gnbe8hqbgUrAl32JHJA+tmnSicUfj/KAV1ZR6F+yfythZNG6QBmjvE31PGP uHsw9XCP9T8j3kg3l36S2vOrSL7GdK8Q7ihz3xTiUf2zc2XIuQpv0cCU9griKvBFPTDDLwtC+ S0JVFuNjbzor9z9xqIlVsESmqrS319w5OQnZ4DKRUTIev9Kz9rJVFHoZhxb4sJKFYzCaFQZiF kiTL4O03PS8iMJp3nWLAvKp+VPWpqNAzEzTRbLtNVVoP7hVh27EorQbsZBd8bFE3LEfsaAHFK maq/bDEAreJpgGVN8gkvBLdMoTunwBYj8WY+HEiUc3/hklApm8= X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200225_010346_858265_416B5C3D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Florian Weimer , Helmut Grohne , GNU C Library , Vineet Gupta , Palmer Dabbelt , Zong Li , debian-arm@lists.debian.org, Alistair Francis , Adhemerval Zanella , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Alistair Francis , arcml , Joseph Myers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Archived-At: List-Archive: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:01 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:37 AM Lukasz Majewski > > wrote: > > which seems a bug in the test suite. The other two get a segfault > > that I have not debugged, but I guess this is likely a problem in your > > patches. Have you seen the same thing? > > I only do run the full (including full test suite) glibc-many-build > (and my Y2038 tests) on the patches which I post to glibc-alpha. > > The Y2038 changes I do test manually if they work as expected - but I > do not run yet the (full) test suites on it, as first _all_ glibc > functions needs to be converted before _TIME_BITS=64 is added. > > The issue is probably with the redirection code. I will look on them > soon. Ok, thanks for taking a look, I won't debug this further then, unless you need help reproducing the issues. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc