From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91DBC433DF for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 18:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DC520792 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 18:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="bA7lN/cW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726606AbgHDSwI (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:52:08 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:23587 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726350AbgHDSwH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:52:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596567126; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Tc+uarOW2um+deUjxrD30eSlJpPz/oG+GT+iGn7NIYY=; b=bA7lN/cWKkDCkOsIZ/4RmlTLfY/DA0t18wsC8aKm5ENLqEQtUVQ62cSk5Rm8Ewh3VxMTcK R4uFTYArSQClnU/s03ozi3/Hcg2EIYtPAfeYkgmyw0lIwxv3d1l3IeeerryhDwCuvpbXNw JJxEBJ0cVsTwNYaS+JyzvyCn/b6m0hU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-366-Uf71OeGpMKGiSR_xjhH00Q-1; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:52:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Uf71OeGpMKGiSR_xjhH00Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBB380183C; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 18:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.40.194.108]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C40535DA6A; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 18:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:52:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:52:00 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Alexey Gladkov Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= / sparse , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sparse | upgrade to upstream v0.6.2 (!2) Message-ID: <20200804185159.GA26829@redhat.com> References: <20200802213035.w7bexg4zdusr25xf@ltop.local> <20200803145308.o2y4mln5fzlgdr4v@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <20200804163812.l2njaeyo7fcsbogt@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200804163812.l2njaeyo7fcsbogt@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On 08/04, Alexey Gladkov wrote: > > Don't get me wrong, I don't mind renaming the utility. This is a good > short term solution I think it would be better to rename it in any case, whatever you and Luc decide. We do not want the naming conflict, imo. Just in case, I'd personally prefer to keep sindex in sparse's repository, but of course I won't argue if you guys decide otherwise. > but to be honest I don't like the name 'sparse-sindex' > because it is very long. me too ;) > Can we think of something shorter ? I can't. May be just "dissect" ? But I agree in advance with any name. Oleg.